
Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
Moderator: trava90
Forum rules
This board is for technical/general usage questions and troubleshooting for the Pale Moon browser only.
Technical issues and questions not related to the Pale Moon browser should be posted in other boards!
Please keep off-topic and general discussion out of this board, thank you!
This board is for technical/general usage questions and troubleshooting for the Pale Moon browser only.
Technical issues and questions not related to the Pale Moon browser should be posted in other boards!
Please keep off-topic and general discussion out of this board, thank you!
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
Cool, cool. I'll give that a try. 

- stevenpusser
- Project Contributor
- Posts: 903
- Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
Working on 32.1.0 standard packages now. Bionic amd64 will take a little bit longer--I've got a lot of irons in the fire, plus Bionic will be EOL soon.
- Pentium4User
- Keeps coming back
- Posts: 981
- Joined: 2019-04-24, 09:38
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
In my opinion, you don't need to waste you time with bionic - it is EOL in one month.
I still use a 64 bit capable Pentium 4 670 processor with Pale Moon.
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
What about ESM/Ubuntu Pro? Up to 2028. (Of course, if OBS will support 18.04.)
- Pentium4User
- Keeps coming back
- Posts: 981
- Joined: 2019-04-24, 09:38
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
This is true, but IIRC it only affects the "main" section of the repositories - so it is only helpful for a small amount of installations, because other parts won't be updated.
I still use a 64 bit capable Pentium 4 670 processor with Pale Moon.
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
I'm using Linux Mint 19.2 based on Bionic and I want to keep using it and Pale Moon until either I die or this notebook dies.
I've just had enough of planned obsolescence.
I've just had enough of planned obsolescence.
- Pentium4User
- Keeps coming back
- Posts: 981
- Joined: 2019-04-24, 09:38
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
Why don't you just upgrade your operating system?
Ubuntu Pro is intended for companies that need long support to avoid painful migrations - normal end users should be fine by just upgrading their OS.
I still use a 64 bit capable Pentium 4 670 processor with Pale Moon.
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
There won't be updates for any software in repositories for this version. Planned obsolescence or not, but i wouldn't use system without security updates to go outside of local network(and even that can be unsafe in some cases).
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
I've been running Windows 98SE for almost 20 years connected 24/7 to the Internet, and Windows XP for 3-4 years towards the end of that period, also connected 24/7. Nobody will ever scare me into living in fear now, with Linux. And just as I won't move house because it's out of trend and won't murder my mother because she's "obsolete" I also won't switch operating systems just because somebody says so.
- Pentium4User
- Keeps coming back
- Posts: 981
- Joined: 2019-04-24, 09:38
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
The don't complaint that software developers will stop providing new software for old versions.Drugwash wrote: ↑2023-03-24, 18:29I've been running Windows 98SE for almost 20 years connected 24/7 to the Internet, and Windows XP for 3-4 years towards the end of that period, also connected 24/7. Nobody will ever scare me into living in fear now, with Linux. And just as I won't move house because it's out of trend and won't murder my mother because she's "obsolete" I also won't switch operating systems just because somebody says so.
You can also use old Pale Moon versions.
I still use a 64 bit capable Pentium 4 670 processor with Pale Moon.
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
Of course. Only problem is when google - or other - idiots invent some new "standards", the whole world follows suit, and then old Pale Moon fails to rise up. That has always been the game.
OK, I've said my piece, no need for further debate. Have a good one.
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
You can also build from source if bionic binaries are no longer provided by Steve. It's not all that difficult; many people do so, especially on *nixes.
"Sometimes, the best way to get what you want is to be a good person." -- Louis Rossmann
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
Yes, I know that is a possibility, or at least will be for a while, but technical difficulties, and lack of deep knowledge of the code and environment prevent me from even trying.
So far I've used the official "portable" builds - the Gtk3 tar archives - and that's been just fine; hopefully they will still work for a while. Steve's build has been installed as some kind of a stable fallback just in case, and was always left a version or two behind.
It's all the same scenario again, with Win9x users complaining, then XP users complaining, then... Some people try to keep a stable environment that just works for them, without needing the "latest and greatest" gimmicks, and that becomes impossible once standards change, toolchain gets more or less forcibly upgraded, and so on. World has no rest while some of us are just so tired of running...
Anyway, it is as it is. Just wanted to provide a personal opinion on the matter for the record. All the best, enjoy the week-end.
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
Off-topic:
If a wizard cursed me and told me that I must use XP from now on, my computer habits would scarcely change. Some software would be swapped for others (notably, this browser for Roytam’s build and Mypal 68 for Epiphany/Konqueror as backup), but everything I need runs in XP or has an equivalent.If this magical spell were instead to fix me to Windows 7, I could even run Genshin Impact. The only real hazards come from malware, for which I should hope routing all traffic through a Linux machine would be enough and not incur the sorcerer’s wrath, and Google releasing more half-standards for sites to adopt, breaking them because web developers cannot leave good enough alone.
If a wizard cursed me and told me that I must use XP from now on, my computer habits would scarcely change. Some software would be swapped for others (notably, this browser for Roytam’s build and Mypal 68 for Epiphany/Konqueror as backup), but everything I need runs in XP or has an equivalent.
Browser: Pale Moon (Pusser’s repository for Debian)
Operating System: Linux Mint Debian Edition 4 (amd64)
※Receiving Debian 10 LTS security upgrades
Hardware: HP Pavilion DV6-7010 (1400 MHz, 6 GB)
Formerly user TheRealMaestro: æsc is the best letter.
Operating System: Linux Mint Debian Edition 4 (amd64)
※Receiving Debian 10 LTS security upgrades
Hardware: HP Pavilion DV6-7010 (1400 MHz, 6 GB)
Formerly user TheRealMaestro: æsc is the best letter.
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
Off-topic:
I migrated from Windows to Linux Mint 21.1 and I am happy. Unlike Windows forcing various privacy invasions and obsolescence Linux Mint seems to be user oriented. What don't you like about newer versions of Linux Mint?Drugwash wrote: ↑2023-03-24, 18:29I've been running Windows 98SE for almost 20 years connected 24/7 to the Internet, and Windows XP for 3-4 years towards the end of that period, also connected 24/7. Nobody will ever scare me into living in fear now, with Linux. And just as I won't move house because it's out of trend and won't murder my mother because she's "obsolete" I also won't switch operating systems just because somebody says so.
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
Off-topic:
I cannot answer for Drugwash, but I am staying on Debian 10, which should still get security upgrades through (E)LTS until 2029, for two reasons beside inertia. The first is that I use Gajim (v1·1·2) as my primary IM client, but Debian 11+ include in their repositories a later version with a hideous interface meant to ape Discord. The other is that Debian 12+ use a version of Glibc that would break Flash on this computer. I have not yet decided what to do at decade’s end.
Browser: Pale Moon (Pusser’s repository for Debian)
Operating System: Linux Mint Debian Edition 4 (amd64)
※Receiving Debian 10 LTS security upgrades
Hardware: HP Pavilion DV6-7010 (1400 MHz, 6 GB)
Formerly user TheRealMaestro: æsc is the best letter.
Operating System: Linux Mint Debian Edition 4 (amd64)
※Receiving Debian 10 LTS security upgrades
Hardware: HP Pavilion DV6-7010 (1400 MHz, 6 GB)
Formerly user TheRealMaestro: æsc is the best letter.
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
Post by stevenpusser » Wed Mar 22, 2023 5:03 pm
Working on 32.1.0 standard packages now. Bionic amd64 will take a little bit longer--I've got a lot of irons in the fire, plus Bionic will be EOL soon.
Does this mean you will not provide 32-bit Palemoon for Bionic any more?
I reported elsewhere that the 32-bit version of PM 32.1.0 will not let me log into Paypal with a password typed on my laptop, just with a code sent to a cell phone. The login screen is also different from the 64-bit one, which my 32-bit laptop cannot install. Maestro steered me here.
Working on 32.1.0 standard packages now. Bionic amd64 will take a little bit longer--I've got a lot of irons in the fire, plus Bionic will be EOL soon.
Does this mean you will not provide 32-bit Palemoon for Bionic any more?
I reported elsewhere that the 32-bit version of PM 32.1.0 will not let me log into Paypal with a password typed on my laptop, just with a code sent to a cell phone. The login screen is also different from the 64-bit one, which my 32-bit laptop cannot install. Maestro steered me here.
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
Using Debian may be an option in order to keep x86_32 support as Debian 10 (the equivalent to Ubuntu 18.04) will be still supported.sindi wrote: ↑2023-03-25, 23:57Post by stevenpusser » Wed Mar 22, 2023 5:03 pm
Working on 32.1.0 standard packages now. Bionic amd64 will take a little bit longer--I've got a lot of irons in the fire, plus Bionic will be EOL soon.
Does this mean you will not provide 32-bit Palemoon for Bionic any more?
I reported elsewhere that the 32-bit version of PM 32.1.0 will not let me log into Paypal with a password typed on my laptop, just with a code sent to a cell phone. The login screen is also different from the 64-bit one, which my 32-bit laptop cannot install. Maestro steered me here.
- stevenpusser
- Project Contributor
- Posts: 903
- Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
I'll try and provide 32-bit for Bionic as long as it doesn't become too time-consuming, but so far it's Bionic amd64 that needs special treatment on that release, not 32.
The OBS still supports Ubuntu back to 14.04, but of course Pale Moon needs a minimum of gcc-7.1, not available in its repos. 18.04 has 7.4, but 64-bit fails with that, and needs to use gcc-8 from its repos.
I've been tied up helping a friend send stuff to lawyers and a court over helping his aged mother; getting text messages and videos off a phone and into PDFs, etc. I'm trying to concentrate on PM builds again today--some have failed on the OBS, some have worked, and I have to figure out what the new error messages mean. The variables are the distro release, architecture, and gcc versions.
And also helping with the Debian 12-based MX 23 development. Luckily the California storms haven't affected the San Diego region adversely, instead they only ended water use restrictions here, and made weeds grow like crazy.
The OBS still supports Ubuntu back to 14.04, but of course Pale Moon needs a minimum of gcc-7.1, not available in its repos. 18.04 has 7.4, but 64-bit fails with that, and needs to use gcc-8 from its repos.
I've been tied up helping a friend send stuff to lawyers and a court over helping his aged mother; getting text messages and videos off a phone and into PDFs, etc. I'm trying to concentrate on PM builds again today--some have failed on the OBS, some have worked, and I have to figure out what the new error messages mean. The variables are the distro release, architecture, and gcc versions.
And also helping with the Debian 12-based MX 23 development. Luckily the California storms haven't affected the San Diego region adversely, instead they only ended water use restrictions here, and made weeds grow like crazy.
- stevenpusser
- Project Contributor
- Posts: 903
- Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Re: Repositories for supported Debian, Raspbian, and Ubuntu releases
Looks like the Bionic i386 and amd64 builds are now successful, along with most other arches and distro releases except for Debian testing and Sid.