uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
Moderators: FranklinDM, Lootyhoof
- Night Wing
- Knows the dark side
- Posts: 5170
- Joined: 2011-10-03, 10:19
- Location: Piney Woods of Southeast Texas, USA
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
Thank you, JustOff.
Linux Mint 21.3 (Virginia) Xfce w/ Linux Pale Moon, Linux Waterfox, Linux SeaLion, Linux Firefox
MX Linux 23.2 (Libretto) Xfce w/ Linux Pale Moon, Linux Waterfox, Linux SeaLion, Linux Firefox
Linux Debian 12.5 (Bookworm) Xfce w/ Linux Pale Moon, Linux Waterfox, Linux SeaLion, Linux Firefox
MX Linux 23.2 (Libretto) Xfce w/ Linux Pale Moon, Linux Waterfox, Linux SeaLion, Linux Firefox
Linux Debian 12.5 (Bookworm) Xfce w/ Linux Pale Moon, Linux Waterfox, Linux SeaLion, Linux Firefox
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
Not that I am happy about the situation with ublock.. existing.. At least you guys are taking up some form of responsibility for it which is a fantastic start. So good on all of you.
Maybe one of you can get God-Emperor Gorhill's permission to officially submit the extension to the Add-ons Site on his behalf and render the companion extension unnecessary at some point in the future.
Maybe one of you can get God-Emperor Gorhill's permission to officially submit the extension to the Add-ons Site on his behalf and render the companion extension unnecessary at some point in the future.
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
Upon research it would seem UBO may be seriously hindered in chromium based browsers and gorhill has been cited as saying that UBO users may have to use alternative browsers,So the legacy version can still be a viable option.
user of multiple puppy linuxes..upup,fossapup.scpup,xenialpup.....
Pale moon 29.4.1
Pale moon 29.4.1
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
Only for users of 'legacy' browsers, meaning us. I doubt gorhill will return to working on this if tomorrow Google makes it impossible to block ads on Chrome.
Off-topic:
The DownThemAll developer too posted a rant about being 'done' with Mozilla after the extensions apocalypse, only to meekly return with a WebExtension version, which is described as being limited compared to its XUL predecessor on its addon page.
The DownThemAll developer too posted a rant about being 'done' with Mozilla after the extensions apocalypse, only to meekly return with a WebExtension version, which is described as being limited compared to its XUL predecessor on its addon page.
"One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them and in the darkness BIND them."
Linux Mint 21 Xfce x64 on HP i5-5200 laptop, 12 GB RAM.
AutoPageColor|PermissionsPlus|PMPlayer|Pure URL|RecordRewind|TextFX
Linux Mint 21 Xfce x64 on HP i5-5200 laptop, 12 GB RAM.
AutoPageColor|PermissionsPlus|PMPlayer|Pure URL|RecordRewind|TextFX
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
Thank you for your prompt action JustOff. much appreciated.JustOff wrote: ↑2019-12-16, 18:55Meanwhile, the nested "!#include" issue has been fixed in uBlock 1.16.4.12
By alternative browsers he means the firefox due to the webext API `dns` and it's ability to uncloak CNAME records. and of course the fact that mozilla won't follow the proposed Manifest v3
Last edited by 90Obadiah on 2019-12-17, 00:14, edited 1 time in total.
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
What is the connection between the dta dev and gorhill?moonbat wrote: ↑2019-12-16, 23:44The DownThemAll developer too posted a rant about being 'done' with Mozilla after the extensions apocalypse, only to meekly return with a WebExtension version, which is described as being limited compared to its XUL predecessor on its addon page.
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
That they know which side of the bread is buttered, and it sure isn't Pale Moon. At least gorhill as far as I know didn't rage quit and then return.
"One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them and in the darkness BIND them."
Linux Mint 21 Xfce x64 on HP i5-5200 laptop, 12 GB RAM.
AutoPageColor|PermissionsPlus|PMPlayer|Pure URL|RecordRewind|TextFX
Linux Mint 21 Xfce x64 on HP i5-5200 laptop, 12 GB RAM.
AutoPageColor|PermissionsPlus|PMPlayer|Pure URL|RecordRewind|TextFX
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
He did (sans rage) quit and then returned though
https://github.com/uBlock-LLC/uBlock/co ... t-10530773
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
Not at present but to conform they may in the future.and of course the fact that mozilla won't follow the proposed Manifest v3
user of multiple puppy linuxes..upup,fossapup.scpup,xenialpup.....
Pale moon 29.4.1
Pale moon 29.4.1
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
I bet at least some people involved in Mozilla (or used to be) are now kicking themselves over the WebExtensions deal. the whole idea behind it was universally applicable extensions across browsers. And now with the manifest v3 and diverting API sets it's not that much different from the way it was before with "legacy" which they did away with. Another one of the Mozilla failures of the decade?
"Sometimes, the best way to get what you want is to be a good person." -- Louis Rossmann
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
The only people celebrating 'cross browser extension compatibility', one of the goals of moving to WebExtensions - are Chrome malware developers. since they can now target the miniscule Firefox userbase as well with little additional effort.
"One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them and in the darkness BIND them."
Linux Mint 21 Xfce x64 on HP i5-5200 laptop, 12 GB RAM.
AutoPageColor|PermissionsPlus|PMPlayer|Pure URL|RecordRewind|TextFX
Linux Mint 21 Xfce x64 on HP i5-5200 laptop, 12 GB RAM.
AutoPageColor|PermissionsPlus|PMPlayer|Pure URL|RecordRewind|TextFX
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
Well, this could definitely be an improvement, but for a number of reasons, I think that now is not the best time to raise this issue.New Tobin Paradigm wrote: ↑2019-12-16, 22:28Maybe one of you can get [..] Gorhill's permission to officially submit the extension to the Add-ons Site on his behalf and render the companion extension unnecessary at some point in the future.
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
Really? For fear of what, exactly?
"Sometimes, the best way to get what you want is to be a good person." -- Louis Rossmann
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
I've been pointing it out on numerous occasions myself:
https://github.com/DandelionSprout/adfi ... -541336950
Although, considering all of the other crap that Chrome fanboys finds tolerable, most of them probably doesn't even care!
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
I do have plans to explore a method of allowing that on the back burner but I don't honestly see the point when it takes less than two minutes to update an extension. The real problem arises about the potential for abuse, of course. The reason you don't edit manifest files and use ftp anymore was everyone including you at some point screwed it up. So now everything is webby and on rails so you CAN'T.
There are bigger fish to fry than allowing someone to scripthack the Add-ons Site and that is HARDLY a blocker for getting Gorhill's permission to bundle up the files and put them on the Add-ons Site. Not like there is a huge amount of development going on with it requiring daily or weekly updates.
There are bigger fish to fry than allowing someone to scripthack the Add-ons Site and that is HARDLY a blocker for getting Gorhill's permission to bundle up the files and put them on the Add-ons Site. Not like there is a huge amount of development going on with it requiring daily or weekly updates.
Last edited by New Tobin Paradigm on 2019-12-17, 18:39, edited 1 time in total.
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
I see that as a feature, not a lack of one.
And I wasn't talking about raising the issue with Tobin, but with Gorhill (because that is what I understood from your response)
"Sometimes, the best way to get what you want is to be a good person." -- Louis Rossmann
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
I totally agree, and thank you for your understanding.
I just meant, that if I were to become the trustee responsible for this task (as Tobin advised), it would require extra efforts while such an API is not available. This is only one of the reasons, but since updating using my extension is already quite acceptable, further improvements can wait for the right time, avoiding pressure on anyone now.
Re: uBlock Origin getting a bit old?
A few clicks, taking less than a minute of your time to release an update. Is that too much to ask for NOT opening the door to the inherent issues an exposed web API would bring with it?
"Sometimes, the best way to get what you want is to be a good person." -- Louis Rossmann
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite