Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.
Moderators: trava90, athenian200
-
- Hobby Astronomer
- Posts: 24
- Joined: 2017-06-27, 23:02
Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.
Hello.
Why Pale Moon 28 x64 has better performance on benchmarks that Firefox 63 x64 ? Mozilla is sleeping or what ?
Why Pale Moon 28 x64 has better performance on benchmarks that Firefox 63 x64 ? Mozilla is sleeping or what ?
-
- Board Warrior
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: 2018-06-08, 17:02
Re: Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.
Just what "benchmarks" are these?
(And then like, why does it matter?)
And that said, PM 28 does have better performance then PM 27 - in real life.
(And then like, why does it matter?)
And that said, PM 28 does have better performance then PM 27 - in real life.
-
- Board Warrior
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: 2014-02-02, 22:15
- Location: Chicagoland
Re: Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.
Nichi nichi kore ko jitsu = Every day is a good day.
-
- Board Warrior
- Posts: 1878
- Joined: 2015-09-30, 23:02
- Location: uk.
Re: Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.
The only benchmark which i take into consideration is what i can see and do on my personal computer.split second differences are not noticed by a user so one browser is a nano-second quicker than another...so what.?
We live in a mathematical society and people love figures and comparisons,however these facts and figures are non-conclusive in regard to the choice of a browser.
Those browsers were not tested on my computer so why should people give creedence to figures which were attained by tests on another machine?
We live in a mathematical society and people love figures and comparisons,however these facts and figures are non-conclusive in regard to the choice of a browser.
Those browsers were not tested on my computer so why should people give creedence to figures which were attained by tests on another machine?
user of multiple puppy linuxes..upup,fossapup.scpup,xenialpup.....
Pale moon 29.4.1
Pale moon 29.4.1
-
- Hobby Astronomer
- Posts: 24
- Joined: 2017-06-27, 23:02
Re: Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.
Exampel Base Mark:therube wrote:Just what "benchmarks" are these?
(And then like, why does it matter?)
And that said, PM 28 does have better performance then PM 27 - in real life.
Firefox 61 x64: 260 point + a lot lags
Firefox 63 x64: 300points + a lot lags
Pale Moon 27 x64: 470points + fast and no lags
Pale Moon 28 x64: 690ppints + fast and no lags
Chrome 69 x64: 1010points + very fast and no lags.
And some site does not work correct in Firefox and Pale Moon 27.
Last edited by RMK99 on 2018-06-28, 19:21, edited 6 times in total.
-
- Board Warrior
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: 2018-06-08, 17:02
Re: Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.
What are "points" & "lags"?
Re: Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.
Again, what benchmark(Is it https://web.basemark.com/)& why does it matter⁉️RMK99 wrote:Exampel Base Mark:therube wrote:Just what "benchmarks" are these?
(And then like, why does it matter?)
And that said, PM 28 does have better performance then PM 27 - in real life.
Last edited by oTPS0 on 2018-06-30, 16:23, edited 1 time in total.