This release has a few fixes and new features courtesy RealityRipple

- Add "Select file extension on rename" preference
- Rename "Remove completed downloads immediately" preference
- Convert Binary Hash to Hex String
Moderators: FranklinDM, Lootyhoof
Referring page context menu item:vchuubacabra wrote: ↑2023-06-30, 17:07Hi. Let's see if this thread of forum is different or business as usual.
Which of feature requests listed below you could implement in this extension?
- Add "Go to referring page" in right-click menu of the download.
- Menu to group downloads by the values of Estimated Time column and/or Progress column to have all failed/skipped/complete/paused etc. downloads close to each other at the moment of sorting
(having Running/Waiting downloads as a constant group would be problematic as they may change their status without user's interference)
- Option to automatically remove Skipped for the reason of identical names downloads from the list like it is done for complete downloads.
- Add new downloads on the top of the list instead of on the bottom.
Yes, may happen it's link added for download for the second time in the same download session or with list saved from previous session, but I mean situation when file queued for download already exist on the storage but is not listed in downloads, and option for already existing files is set to Ask. Then GtA creates downloads list entry, asks what to do, gets answer "Skip" and sets status of download entry to Skipped. If this is exactly what Remove Duplicates is for, then OK (but needs clarifying imo). And if this looks like insignificant improvement, then just an option "Go to referring page" is good too.RealityRipple wrote: ↑2023-06-30, 18:09Remove identical names:
There's a context menu sub-item that's literally called "Remove Duplicates" under the "Remove Downloads" menu. There's also a setting under general: "When a file of the same name already exists:" with the options "Rename", "Overwrite", "Skip", or "Ask".
moonbat wrote: ↑2023-07-17, 00:15The original DownThemAll was one of the most popular classic Firefox extensions; I decided to fork it for Pale Moon in case the original XUL one went away (the current Firefox version is a web extension and lacks features that this one does). It is mostly feature complete as a download manager, RealityRipple has made patches for small fixes now and then.
Ok, let me ask directly: will you add to extension some improvements from RealityRipple's fork which I asked for few posts above?Random Techsupport Article wrote: Was this answer helpful? : [Yes] [No]
Read again:vchuubacabra wrote: ↑2023-07-17, 15:15Ok, let me ask directly: will you add to extension some improvements from RealityRipple's fork which I asked for few posts above?
and then read the changelog in this very thread before your first comments.
What the fuck are you talking about?vchuubacabra wrote: ↑2023-07-18, 05:13So your historical digression translates into you DON'T ADD NEW FEATURES and if I want some, I need to find a way to do it MYSELF, like in my inqury.
About the story you told of how great original Firefox extension was and why you decided to fork it and blah blah blah.
Then you need to understand how open source projects and forks work; or do you expect new features in Firefox to automatically be added to Pale Moon as well, based on both codebases having had a common ancestor? RealityRipple has often contributed patches to integrate here and I've always added them.vchuubacabra wrote: ↑2023-07-18, 07:14RealityRipple made those patches in his own fork. I thought all changes are centralized and automatically added to main extension, but no, it's LEGO for developers as always.