rocket.chat

[lazyest]

There is a popular thing came instead of Slack called rocket.chat,opensource, nodejs and so on. But we have many issues with palemoon pity, begining from installation process and later, many controls are hanging, lots of CSS issues it seems,at least in my cases. Can someone confirm or not it for a start?

[moonbat]

There's no demo offered unless you sign up with a credit card, typical proprietary corporate BS. As usual it links to a dozen different domains to do its business so you'll have to whitelist metomic.io, stackpathdns.com, and github.com/.io even for the main page to work properly. Would it kill them to run a demo server where you can immediately login and see for yourself what features are offered?

[Moonchild]

Off-topic:

Would it kill them to run a demo server where you can immediately login and see for yourself what features are offered?

It probably would if they are vaporware.

[lazyest]

Its possible to deploy own one. I can provide pre-brewed AWS instance for playing if someone is interested

[lazyest]

Its not a vaporware I think. Its just regular OSS fundraising model nowadays pity

[moonbat]

Its possible to deploy own one. I can provide pre-brewed AWS instance for playing if someone is interested

Yeah that would help, no one can help troubleshoot unless they're able to view and use the site in question.

[RoestVrijStaal]

Its not a vaporware I think. Its just regular OSS fundraising model nowadays pity

Off-topic:
I'd hardly believe they've a funding problem.

[satrow]

Its not a vaporware I think. Its just regular OSS fundraising model nowadays pity

Off-topic:
I'd hardly believe they've a funding problem.

Please indicate what any links are about, we have Rules for good reason:

Linking

"Don't provide a link without an explanation what it links to.
If you provide a link to an external site, provide a brief description of the site and how it is relevant to the discussion at hand. "

[RoestVrijStaal]

Off-topic:

Please indicate what any links are about, we have Rules for good reason:

Linking

"Don't provide a link without an explanation what it links to.
If you provide a link to an external site, provide a brief description of the site and how it is relevant to the discussion at hand. "

Please note the section you talk about is bbcoded with offtopic. But eh, something like this?

Off-topic:
I'd hardly believe they've a fund¹ing problem².

¹ :
Website: Archive.is
Description: Archived version of https://techcrunch[a_dot_here_because_phpBB_auto_converts_it_to_a_link_which_I_do_not_want_to_describe_again]com/2021/02/03/rocket-chat-raises-19m-for-its-open-source-approach-to-integrated-enterprise-messaging/
Reason: To backup my suggestion, and news websites tend to alter their routing through the years.

²:
Website: Archive.is
Description: Archived version of https://rocket[dot_here_because_phpBB_auto_converts_it_to_a_link_which_I_do_not_want_to_describe_again]chat/blog/company/rocket-chat-raises-19-million-in-series-a-funding-confirming-privacy-first-communication-as-a-major-trend-in-2021/
Reason: To backup my suggestion, and companies tend to alter their routing of their through the years or remove their blog posts when they receive a donation is is more than a yearly income of an Average Joe.

[Moonchild]

Off-topic:
Offtopic doesn't excuse you from following the rules.
And no, not like that. Just don't interject links on parts of words if you can help it, especially if the linked text has no bearing on what it links too (and even less so if you are using shortened URLs that nobody can guess their target of by just looking at it). post-referencing such a thing doesn't really make it any better.
See how others do linkage on the forum for hints.

[lazyest]

https://54.80.17.144.c.hossted.com/
installation process and further experience at my side was a bit buggy
Plz check it out. I'll terminate this instance in couple of days

[lazyest]

I've complete registration process (its still buggy) and so on
link still the same, admin user password m+l9shhje5Fz+w==