For support with specific websites
Moderator: trava90
Forum rules
Please
always mention the name/domain of the website in question in your topic title.
Please one website per topic thread (to help keep things organized). While behavior on different sites might at first glance seem similar, they are not necessarily caused by the same.
Please try to include any relevant output from the Toolkit Error Console or the Developer Tools Web Console using the following procedure:
- Clear any current output
- Navigate or refresh the page in question
- Copy and paste Errors or seemingly relevant Warnings into a single [ code ] block.
-
prengle
- Apollo supporter

- Posts: 47
- Joined: 2020-09-05, 01:53
Post
by prengle » 2021-01-27, 20:51
trying to access youtube studio using pm 28.17.0 in safe mode and with no useragent override now gives me this obnoxious, condescending error screen:
troubleshooting information:
https://pastebin.com/kFu299wt
miraculously, the rest of youtube seems to be working ok without a useragent override (including live chat), it's just studio that's borked
-
Moonchild
- Project founder

- Posts: 39699
- Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
- Location: Sweden
Post
by Moonchild » 2021-01-27, 21:01
"user set" to a blank string is NOT the same as "no override"
Ultimately YT studio is Google's service and it will aim at Chrome. So, it can break any minute of any day they decide to use Chrome exclusive stuff.
"Sales hates anything that can't be turned into a confident sentence." - anonymous warehouse worker
"Why debate someone you fundamentally don't trust?" - Dario Amodei
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
-
prengle
- Apollo supporter

- Posts: 47
- Joined: 2020-09-05, 01:53
Post
by prengle » 2021-01-27, 21:36
Moonchild wrote: ↑2021-01-27, 21:01
"user set" to a blank string is NOT the same as "no override"
Ultimately YT studio is Google's service and it will aim at Chrome. So, it can break any minute of any day they decide to use Chrome exclusive stuff.
christ, i deleted the override preference and restarted and now it works again for some reason? what? it would be great if someone told me how that makes a difference because i can't imagine why
if i wasn't aware of google's unquestioned dominance over the internet hellscape we have now, i wouldn't be clinging onto pale moon (and i wouldn't feel dirty about even considering using a chromium-based browser). i can't even log into a google account with seamonkey atm, because for some baffling reason, the login page thinks javascript is disabled (i checked, it isn't), so at this point i really have no idea what's going on. really not looking forward to polymer/webcomponents becoming commonplace
-
moonbat
- Knows the dark side

- Posts: 5916
- Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45
Post
by moonbat » 2021-01-28, 04:56
prengle wrote: ↑2021-01-27, 21:36
really not looking forward to polymer/webcomponents becoming commonplace
It's inevitable that Google services will become exclusive to Chrome derivatives and copycats. When Microsoft bundled IE with Windows and added non standard features to it, there was a huge brouhaha over antitrust, but people aren't even aware this is a problem with Google.
-
Moonchild
- Project founder

- Posts: 39699
- Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
- Location: Sweden
Post
by Moonchild » 2021-01-28, 07:06
moonbat wrote: ↑2021-01-28, 04:56
It's inevitable that Google services will become exclusive to Chrome derivatives and copycats.
We've been saying this for
years.
"Sales hates anything that can't be turned into a confident sentence." - anonymous warehouse worker
"Why debate someone you fundamentally don't trust?" - Dario Amodei
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
-
moonbat
- Knows the dark side

- Posts: 5916
- Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45
Post
by moonbat » 2021-01-28, 08:53
And now reality stares in the face
Off-topic:Speaking of playing Cassandra, I can't imagine the reaction when you release the next major version and legacy FF extensions instantly have a brainfart because they assumed that v 29 = Australis. Going by how well the updated incompatibility warning on the addons page was received
-
Moonchild
- Project founder

- Posts: 39699
- Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
- Location: Sweden
Post
by Moonchild » 2021-01-28, 09:15
Off-topic:
The warning about old and unmaintained legacy Firefox extensions is there for a reason.
If they have a brainfart because of some internal checking assuming we are Firefox, then that's just too bad and yet another reason why people need to be forking these things and actually maintaining them. We can't hold back development on account of that kind of stuff. Poorly received or not. There will be more changes that are going to be poorly received in the future, I'm sure, but it's simply not possible to stand still and adapt at the same time.
"Sales hates anything that can't be turned into a confident sentence." - anonymous warehouse worker
"Why debate someone you fundamentally don't trust?" - Dario Amodei
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
-
moonbat
- Knows the dark side

- Posts: 5916
- Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45
Post
by moonbat » 2021-01-28, 09:40
Off-topic:
One thing that's lost on the 'keep PM permanently frozen as a vehicle for my old extensions else I will threaten to switch to Waterfox' crowd is that the last versions legacy extensions were released no later than 2017. Had Firefox continued supporting the technology they would be still be 4 years out of date if the author hadn't kept pace.
-
New Tobin Paradigm
Post
by New Tobin Paradigm » 2021-01-28, 10:21
Well if they go to Waterfox "Classic" they will be back eventually because that is a dead end tech wise. Hell they even used some of our stuff at one point before Waterquantum happened.
Still Basilisk will do ok for a theoretical 98% compatible Firefox extension driver and is already Australis. Though compat there will also suffer some over time as well for the same reason desipte being largely pseudo-static.
The good news about Basilisk is it don't take much to do extensions for both despite Australis. But this community and userbase needs a swift kick in the ass to get started again.. If that doesn't work long term then I guess it doesn't work and we have all collectively failed each other and that would be a great shame.
Still same result in the end if we don't give them a reason to get motivated.
So let's be active about this...