For support with specific websites
Moderator: trava90
Forum rules
Please
always mention the name/domain of the website in question in your topic title.
Please one website per topic thread (to help keep things organized). While behavior on different sites might at first glance seem similar, they are not necessarily caused by the same.
Please try to include any relevant output from the Toolkit Error Console or the Developer Tools Web Console using the following procedure:
- Clear any current output
- Navigate or refresh the page in question
- Copy and paste Errors or seemingly relevant Warnings into a single [ code ] block.
-
user88818
Post
by user88818 » 2020-07-15, 17:47
hi everyone… Just when I thought my browser was working perfect I updated and now this website beeg.com is just blank
it's one of the few adult websites that has nicer stuff.... And is maintained pretty well.or at least I thought
So I'm back to my friends here does anyone have any idea what happened? I updated it's broken. It sucks it's a good website I mean was
Any ideas I will be here and thanks in advance
Take care
PS I'm still loyal

-
therube
- Board Warrior

- Posts: 1742
- Joined: 2018-06-08, 17:02
Post
by therube » 2020-07-15, 18:31
What version of PM?
Does the site display correctly if you restart PM in
Safe Mode?
(My first look at the site, not realizing it was an Adult site, I thought it had been hacked.
On XP presently, & realizing it is Adult, still looks like it is having issues, but at least not blank.)
-
badnick
- Astronaut

- Posts: 670
- Joined: 2017-03-23, 19:56
Post
by badnick » 2020-07-15, 18:51
Same here tested on a fresh profile. Videos links are not showing or if you refresh the page they appear for a second and then disappear.
Windows 10 pro /64 (version 1809)
PM last/64
-
vannilla
- Moon Magic practitioner

- Posts: 2481
- Joined: 2018-05-05, 13:29
Post
by vannilla » 2020-07-15, 19:51
On 28.10 it works, so it's probably something on the new version, assuming you updated to 28.11.
Once I update too, if the issue has not been solved already I'll check it out again.
-
badnick
- Astronaut

- Posts: 670
- Joined: 2017-03-23, 19:56
Post
by badnick » 2020-07-15, 20:10
I'm on the new version 28.11.0
Windows 10 pro /64 (version 1809)
PM last/64
-
user88818
Post
by user88818 » 2020-07-16, 02:37
it's definitely the new version I'm having software blues other Internet files and programmers are being creepy. The worlds so unsafe it seems… So I was going to do an image file restore because of this anyway. I use Acronis and make exact copies of my operating system to be restored it takes 3.5 minutes so no big deal.
So I'm back using pay on the 28.10 and yeah it's working. Vanilla have you updated yet you will see the same thing. Can you help
Some you guys here have been so smart. I mean I'm good with PCs been doing it forever but I can't fix browsers. Oh pale moon team if you can scan and see that were having a problem could you please find out what it was I mean what it is… 28.10 works but not the new one so I'm going to skip it…
I don't like having to skip an update because pale mood I really support the writers of this awesome browser. So if someone hint hint has some fix I would love to go normal and resume updates.
Anyway thanks a lot guys all sit around on 28.10 for a while see if we can figure this out… As I'm typing pale moon tried updating…I felt awful having to cancel the update. Anyway thanks guys we rock…

-
moonbat
- Knows the dark side

- Posts: 5689
- Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45
Post
by moonbat » 2020-07-16, 04:22
If a site breaks, the first thing is to check your adblocker if it's blocking scripts that are needed to function. Next are cookies, some sites don't work properly if they're blocked. Finally, you can look at the developer console (tools-web developer-web console) to see if there are any Javascript errors on the page. In your case it might be the latter with 28.11 (haven't got the update yet so can't tell).
-
user88818
Post
by user88818 » 2020-07-16, 05:50
hi moonbat… Really cool name by the way for this forum especially… Anyway I understand my U block… It's turned off.cookies are set to accept… But the console I never figure those out yet.. It's definitely the browser anyway because soon as I roll back to 2810 it works. same settings
Our good friends the designers changed something. And I'm not at that level I need help .
But thank you for getting back to me. I'm just going to have to wait and hope something comes up that I can handle. For now I hate to say this but I told pale mood to not update. I'll be back here though hoping something changes and maybe even skip this version and try maybe again in the future. 28.10 was actually working pretty good I don't know what happened.
I'll be back
-
moonbat
- Knows the dark side

- Posts: 5689
- Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45
Post
by moonbat » 2020-07-16, 06:28
user88818 wrote: ↑2020-07-16, 05:50
It's definitely the browser anyway because soon as I roll back to 2810 it works. same settings
Our good friends the designers changed something. And I'm not at that level I need help .
It must be - which is why any error messages in the console from the site in question could indicate what's gone wrong. If you could see if there are any and post them here it will help understand what's broken.
-
therube
- Board Warrior

- Posts: 1742
- Joined: 2018-06-08, 17:02
Post
by therube » 2020-07-16, 11:07
(Now that I'm off of XP), the site does display & displays correctly, & the videos do play - in PM 28.9.3.
And yes, the site does fail in 28.11.0.
The page does load.
It is "essentially" blank (in that no video thumbnails display) [though there are some page "decorations"].
(It does not look to be a useragent issue.)
Code: Select all
TypeError: 'signal' member of RequestInit does not implement interface AbortSignal.
Stack trace:
fetch@https://beeg.com/js/chunk-vendors.7662656a.js:75:149697
Rt/</<@https://beeg.com/js/chunk-vendors.7662656a.js:75:113980
t/<@https://beeg.com/js/app.36905ee2.js:1:179472
c@https://beeg.com/js/chunk-vendors.7662656a.js:53:39705
w/<@https://beeg.com/js/chunk-vendors.7662656a.js:53:41029
...
-
adesh
- Board Warrior

- Posts: 1273
- Joined: 2017-06-06, 07:38
Post
by adesh » 2020-07-16, 11:33
I think the site is doing feature detection (good) and checks for the Streams API, a part of which AbortController was implemented in
https://github.com/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/1587. Now we probably need to implement AbortSignal also.
Earlier the site worked as it was using fallback code when "abort" API was not implemented.
-
Moonchild
- Pale Moon guru

- Posts: 38398
- Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
- Location: Motala, SE
Post
by Moonchild » 2020-07-16, 19:01
As a workaround, if you need to use the site in the meantime, set dom.abortController.enabled to false in about:config.
"There is no point in arguing with an idiot, because then you're both idiots." - Anonymous
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
-
Moonchild
- Pale Moon guru

- Posts: 38398
- Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
- Location: Motala, SE
Post
by Moonchild » 2020-07-16, 19:12
AbortSignal should be available as it was
implemented along with AbortController... unless I've missed something?
"There is no point in arguing with an idiot, because then you're both idiots." - Anonymous
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
-
user88818
Post
by user88818 » 2020-07-16, 20:25
hi everyone… I'm using 28.10 and I took a look in about config for set dom.abortController and also AbortSignal because I'm listening very carefully but in 28.10 they don't bring anything up
If it's verified a fix I will update but I'm trying to be careful because it's more time-consuming for me I just created image files of my computer to run with 28.10 and well I can experiment but if I put in 28.11 and it fails I guess I can just fall back on an image file right.
are those dom.abortController and the other only in 28.11? …I really trust you guys and I don't mind changing my browser it's really cool that's why I'm here with my favorite team… But can someone verify and put my mind to rest that those things are implemented in the new browser because they're not in
28.10
I just started laughing because this is kind of fun I love the way we all stick together

-
Moonchild
- Pale Moon guru

- Posts: 38398
- Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
- Location: Motala, SE
Post
by Moonchild » 2020-07-16, 21:02
The abort controller API (and related pref) is new functionality in 28.11. 28.10 won't have it.
"There is no point in arguing with an idiot, because then you're both idiots." - Anonymous
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
-
user88818
Post
by user88818 » 2020-07-16, 22:39
Moon Child it's really you

… Of course you're a genius it's your browser LOL
I trust you so much I instantly downloaded the update made the change and the browsers normal again like magic
It must be so cool having your own browser that you created and having all of us Moon fans who absolutely love this work you've done
I am such a loyal fan this is so cool.… This is the greatest browser on the planet …we are rebels we rock LOL
And thank you for everyone else we stick together.
a big thank you.
-
therube
- Board Warrior

- Posts: 1742
- Joined: 2018-06-08, 17:02
Post
by therube » 2020-07-16, 23:22
As a workaround, if you need to use the site in the meantime, set dom.abortController.enabled to false in about:config.
Thanks, that works.
(Now,
dom, are you trying to insinuate something there

.)
-
Tharthan
- Board Warrior

- Posts: 1442
- Joined: 2019-05-20, 20:07
- Location: New England
Post
by Tharthan » 2020-07-24, 08:35
user88818 wrote: ↑2020-07-16, 22:39
It must be so cool having your own browser that you created and having all of us Moon fans who absolutely love this work you've done
I am such a loyal fan this is so cool.… This is the greatest browser on the planet …we are rebels we rock LOL
And thank you for everyone else we stick together.
Moonchild has told me previously, with regard to a claim that I was making that there are doubtlessly plenty of users who understand that browsers sometimes have hiccups (especially smaller browsers, like Pale Moon), and that sometimes (in the course of browser development) the developers of a browser can make an error in judgement, and that those users would still stick around so long as things were made right afterwards:
Moonchild wrote: ↑2019-07-16, 02:29
Past experience has taught us that these users are a vast minority.
But it's actually worse.
Not only will their trust turn on the edge of a dime, any even very slight error in judgement (whether it's from inexperience, lack of necessary information, reliance on third parties, or otherwise) or even a
perceived error in judgement that was not
actually an error in judgement (but often misinformation by others, instead) is not only considered reason to break off, but also to crusade against the project for daring not to be perfect. Several minor things (and some incorrectly stated things) have been inflated and repeated ad nauseam as if it was some great injustice.
...
So we all ought to be thankful for the users who
do have an earnest loyalty to the browser and the project. I hope, in times when matters may potentially get a bit difficult, that you will continue to have such loyalty, user88818.
"This is a war against individuality and intelligence. Only thing we can do is stand strong." —
adesh, 9 January 2020
"I used to think I was a grumpy old man, but I don't hold a candle compared to Tharthan." —
Cassette, 9 September 2020
-
moonbat
- Knows the dark side

- Posts: 5689
- Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45
Post
by moonbat » 2020-07-24, 09:27
user88818 wrote: ↑2020-07-16, 22:39
a big thank you.
You mean a beeg thank you

-
New Tobin Paradigm
Post
by New Tobin Paradigm » 2020-07-24, 09:39
I think user88818 might be being disingenuous here. No one talks like that and there is such an era of sarcasm in what he said.
Well user88818, am I correct?