With the recent Python 3 introduction, I should give Linux compilation another shot in 13.2
Dactyloidae Browser (Basilisk fork)
Moderators: trava90, athenian200
-
ownedbywuigi
- Fanatic

- Posts: 102
- Joined: 2026-03-09, 21:48
- Location: United Kingdom
Re: Dactyloidae Browser (Basilisk fork)
Windows Server 2022, i9 9900K, 32GB DDR4, GTX 970, Dactyloidae 13.1
OS X Monterey, 2013 Mac Pro, Xeon e5-1650v2, 2x FirePro D500, 64GB DDR3, Dactyloidae 13.1
OS X Monterey, 2013 Mac Pro, Xeon e5-1650v2, 2x FirePro D500, 64GB DDR3, Dactyloidae 13.1
-
Mæstro
- Board Warrior

- Posts: 1076
- Joined: 2019-08-13, 00:30
- Location: Casumia
Re: Dactyloidae Browser (Basilisk fork)
Is this fork experimental, as a vision into a world where Mozilla thought WebExtensions should be yet another extension type beside XUL, NPAPI and Jetpack, or do you actually intend this for users who wish a browser with flat design and WebExtensions, yet favour the Goanna engine? What has been your motivation in this?
‘Life is a fever dream Mæstro would enjoy.’
All posts 100% organic. Ash is the best letter.
What is being nice online?
Debian 10 ELTS / Official PM build
All posts 100% organic. Ash is the best letter.
What is being nice online?
Debian 10 ELTS / Official PM build
-
ownedbywuigi
- Fanatic

- Posts: 102
- Joined: 2026-03-09, 21:48
- Location: United Kingdom
Re: Dactyloidae Browser (Basilisk fork)
To answer your questions:Mæstro wrote: ↑2026-04-06, 01:19Is this fork experimental, as a vision into a world where Mozilla thought WebExtensions should be yet another extension type beside XUL, NPAPI and Jetpack, or do you actually intend this for users who wish a browser with flat design and WebExtensions, yet favour the Goanna engine? What has been your motivation in this?
1. There isn’t a single vision for my fork, I just fuck around and find out I guess.
2. My motivation mainly is to increase the speed and responsiveness of the Goanna engine, at first it was just an ‘experiment’ fork but since my optimisations have gotten popular, I decided to make speed my main motivator for this fork. The theme was just a nice bonus since I am fond of the early Metro design (probably coming from me growing up with early Windows 10)
Windows Server 2022, i9 9900K, 32GB DDR4, GTX 970, Dactyloidae 13.1
OS X Monterey, 2013 Mac Pro, Xeon e5-1650v2, 2x FirePro D500, 64GB DDR3, Dactyloidae 13.1
OS X Monterey, 2013 Mac Pro, Xeon e5-1650v2, 2x FirePro D500, 64GB DDR3, Dactyloidae 13.1
-
ownedbywuigi
- Fanatic

- Posts: 102
- Joined: 2026-03-09, 21:48
- Location: United Kingdom
Re: Dactyloidae Browser (Basilisk fork)
Can now confirm (?) that Dactyloidae has the same speed as LibreWolf (latest) in real world testing (loading YouTube, and other "real world" sites)
Windows Server 2022, i9 9900K, 32GB DDR4, GTX 970, Dactyloidae 13.1
OS X Monterey, 2013 Mac Pro, Xeon e5-1650v2, 2x FirePro D500, 64GB DDR3, Dactyloidae 13.1
OS X Monterey, 2013 Mac Pro, Xeon e5-1650v2, 2x FirePro D500, 64GB DDR3, Dactyloidae 13.1
-
ownedbywuigi
- Fanatic

- Posts: 102
- Joined: 2026-03-09, 21:48
- Location: United Kingdom
Re: Dactyloidae Browser (Basilisk fork)
Will be taking a short break from development to upstream the notable changes into UXP.
Expect some cool stuff
Expect some cool stuff
Windows Server 2022, i9 9900K, 32GB DDR4, GTX 970, Dactyloidae 13.1
OS X Monterey, 2013 Mac Pro, Xeon e5-1650v2, 2x FirePro D500, 64GB DDR3, Dactyloidae 13.1
OS X Monterey, 2013 Mac Pro, Xeon e5-1650v2, 2x FirePro D500, 64GB DDR3, Dactyloidae 13.1
-
walmar
- New to the forum

- Posts: 1
- Joined: 2026-04-08, 18:42
- Location: Germany
Re: Dactyloidae Browser (Basilisk fork)
Hello everybody.
Pardon, based on my own observations: The tested Dactyloidae version 13.1 pre-release 2 seems to be missing some basic WebExtensions features.
The Redirector extension is supposed to work with FF 42+, for example.
In my main browser Waterfox/56.6.2022.11 from 2022 it works just fine – this also supports overlay, bootstrapped and add-on SDK extensions.
With Dactyloidae, the buttons in the popup do not work and the console returns, among other things, the following lines.
It seems to me that WebExtensions with a user interface do not function as intended without the missing functionality.
As much as I would like a new browser with a similar range of functions to the discontinued FF 56 and its fork, I would like more clarity.
Please reply, ownedbywuigi, whether you are still working on the aforementioned missing functionality or plan to work on it in the near future, or whether the limitation will be accepted for an indefinite period.
Thanks for your efforts.
- UXP/README.md in main - UXP - Dactyloidae ReposWebExtensions support comparable to Firefox ESR 78
Pardon, based on my own observations: The tested Dactyloidae version 13.1 pre-release 2 seems to be missing some basic WebExtensions features.
The Redirector extension is supposed to work with FF 42+, for example.
In my main browser Waterfox/56.6.2022.11 from 2022 it works just fine – this also supports overlay, bootstrapped and add-on SDK extensions.
With Dactyloidae, the buttons in the popup do not work and the console returns, among other things, the following lines.
Similar results occur with popups from other extensions such as uBlock Origin, Violentmonkey or Polly/Polly+.tabs is undefined popup.js:27
WebRequest is not defined ext-webRequest.js:120
It seems to me that WebExtensions with a user interface do not function as intended without the missing functionality.
As much as I would like a new browser with a similar range of functions to the discontinued FF 56 and its fork, I would like more clarity.
Please reply, ownedbywuigi, whether you are still working on the aforementioned missing functionality or plan to work on it in the near future, or whether the limitation will be accepted for an indefinite period.
Thanks for your efforts.
-
ownedbywuigi
- Fanatic

- Posts: 102
- Joined: 2026-03-09, 21:48
- Location: United Kingdom
Re: Dactyloidae Browser (Basilisk fork)
I have not ported EVERYTHING from Waterfox Classic, these aforementioned issues with WebExtensions and other features from Waterfox Classic will be addressed in 13.2.walmar wrote: ↑2026-04-08, 19:05Hello everybody.
- UXP/README.md in main - UXP - Dactyloidae ReposWebExtensions support comparable to Firefox ESR 78
Pardon, based on my own observations: The tested Dactyloidae version 13.1 pre-release 2 seems to be missing some basic WebExtensions features.
The Redirector extension is supposed to work with FF 42+, for example.
In my main browser Waterfox/56.6.2022.11 from 2022 it works just fine – this also supports overlay, bootstrapped and add-on SDK extensions.
With Dactyloidae, the buttons in the popup do not work and the console returns, among other things, the following lines.Similar results occur with popups from other extensions such as uBlock Origin, Violentmonkey or Polly/Polly+.tabs is undefined popup.js:27
WebRequest is not defined ext-webRequest.js:120
It seems to me that WebExtensions with a user interface do not function as intended without the missing functionality.
As much as I would like a new browser with a similar range of functions to the discontinued FF 56 and its fork, I would like more clarity.
Please reply, ownedbywuigi, whether you are still working on the aforementioned missing functionality or plan to work on it in the near future, or whether the limitation will be accepted for an indefinite period.
Thanks for your efforts.
Again, apologies for the WebExtension issues, I did not know which extensions to test properly during 13.1 development, aside from the ones I use on the daily.
It seems like my porting of WebRequest from MyPal68 didn't work as well as I thought, will also fix in 13.2. Thanks for your feedback.
Windows Server 2022, i9 9900K, 32GB DDR4, GTX 970, Dactyloidae 13.1
OS X Monterey, 2013 Mac Pro, Xeon e5-1650v2, 2x FirePro D500, 64GB DDR3, Dactyloidae 13.1
OS X Monterey, 2013 Mac Pro, Xeon e5-1650v2, 2x FirePro D500, 64GB DDR3, Dactyloidae 13.1