Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Off-topic discussion/chat/argue area with special rules of engagement.
Forum rules
The Off-Topic area is a general community discussion and chat area with special rules of engagement.

Enter, read and post at your own risk. You have been warned!
While our staff will try to guide the herd into sensible directions, this board is a mostly unrestricted zone where almost anything can be discussed, including matters not directly related to the project, technology or similar adjacent topics.

We do, however, require that you:
  • Do not post anything pornographic.
  • Do not post hate speech in the traditional sense of the term.
  • Do not post content that is illegal (including links to protected software, cracks, etc.)
  • Do not post commercial advertisements, SEO links or SPAM posts.
We also ask that you keep strongly polarizing topics like politics and religion to a minimum. This forum is not the right place to discuss such things.
Please do exercise some common sense. How you act here will inevitably influence how you are treated elsewhere.
User avatar
Moonchild
Project founder
Project founder
Posts: 39276
Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
Location: Sweden

Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by Moonchild » 2022-05-13, 18:32

So, Google is at their blatant pushing game of Chrome again in all spaces they control.

Youtube:
yt-chrome.png
And I was on there with Edge which is Blink already, not Pale Moon...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Praise from a narcissistic person is always a poison dart. They don't share the stage, so discernment matters." - Dr. Ramani
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite

User avatar
Mæstro
Board Warrior
Board Warrior
Posts: 1140
Joined: 2019-08-13, 00:30
Location: Casumia

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by Mæstro » 2022-05-13, 18:40

Moonchild wrote:
2022-05-13, 18:32
And I was on there with Edge which is Blink already, not Pale Moon...
Watching the leopard’s four heads bite one another is always fun.
Life is a fever dream Mæstro would enjoy.
All posts 100% organic. Ash is the best letter.
What is being nice online?
Debian 10 ELTS / Official PM build

User avatar
athenian200
Contributing developer
Contributing developer
Posts: 1755
Joined: 2018-10-28, 19:56
Location: Georgia

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by athenian200 » 2022-05-13, 19:23

Yeah, they've been doing that on Edge for as long as I can remember. Sometimes they let up, but it always seems to comes back within a month or two.

Google seems to really hate Edge far more than they hate Firefox. At the very least, no one I know who uses Firefox reports the same experience and they all seem to think I'm exaggerating when I describe how Google treats competing browsers.
"The Athenians, however, represent the unity of these opposites; in them, mind or spirit has emerged from the Theban subjectivity without losing itself in the Spartan objectivity of ethical life. With the Athenians, the rights of the State and of the individual found as perfect a union as was possible at all at the level of the Greek spirit." -- Hegel's philosophy of Mind

Pentium4User
Board Warrior
Board Warrior
Posts: 1330
Joined: 2019-04-24, 09:38

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by Pentium4User » 2022-05-13, 19:29

Same applied to IE. I remember that only in IE they had the "Download Chrome" banner on their search.

User avatar
Moonchild
Project founder
Project founder
Posts: 39276
Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
Location: Sweden

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by Moonchild » 2022-05-13, 19:43

Banners aren't even that bad, but these "notifications" are deliberately placed OVER page controls and content.
"Praise from a narcissistic person is always a poison dart. They don't share the stage, so discernment matters." - Dr. Ramani
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite

User avatar
andyprough
Board Warrior
Board Warrior
Posts: 1399
Joined: 2020-05-31, 04:33

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by andyprough » 2022-05-13, 20:02

athenian200 wrote:
2022-05-13, 19:23
Google seems to really hate Edge far more than they hate Firefox.
Chrome has lost about 6% to 10% of the browser market share over the past two years, while Edge has been gaining market share the fastest. There's quite a few reasons ($$$$$$$) why Google hates Edge.

User avatar
Eduardo Lucas
Moon lover
Moon lover
Posts: 94
Joined: 2021-07-08, 13:08
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by Eduardo Lucas » 2022-05-13, 20:28

Moonchild wrote:
2022-05-13, 18:32
So, Google is at their blatant pushing game of Chrome again in all spaces they control.

Youtube:
yt-chrome.png
And I was on there with Edge which is Blink already, not Pale Moon...
This happened with me recently in blink browsers. I feel like i'm in the IE days again holy lord

Pentium4User
Board Warrior
Board Warrior
Posts: 1330
Joined: 2019-04-24, 09:38

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by Pentium4User » 2022-05-14, 03:20

I assume the reason is that people noticed that Edge is mostly Chrome and therefore there is mostly no need for them to install Chrome. The IE is incompatible with many sites since years.

User avatar
Night Wing
Knows the dark side
Knows the dark side
Posts: 5926
Joined: 2011-10-03, 10:19
Location: Piney Woods of Southeast Texas, USA

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by Night Wing » 2022-05-14, 11:38

A little off topic, but still close enough.

Speaking of YouTube, I don't know what all the technical details was changed in Pale Moon 31.0 but now, I can watch YouTube videos again on all four of my computers (2 desktop towers, 2 laptops) without any freezing or lockups using 31. :D
MX Linux 25.1 (Infinity) Xfce w/Pale Moon, Waterfox, Firefox
Linux Debian 13.4 (Trixie) Xfce w/Pale Moon, Waterfox, Firefox

User avatar
Mæstro
Board Warrior
Board Warrior
Posts: 1140
Joined: 2019-08-13, 00:30
Location: Casumia

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by Mæstro » 2022-05-14, 22:09

Pentium4User wrote:
2022-05-14, 03:20
I assume the reason is that people noticed that Edge is mostly Chrome and therefore there is mostly no need for them to install Chrome.
It would be funny, if Microsoft’s leeching gets bad enough, if Google closes Chromium’s further development to try to starve it.
Life is a fever dream Mæstro would enjoy.
All posts 100% organic. Ash is the best letter.
What is being nice online?
Debian 10 ELTS / Official PM build

User avatar
athenian200
Contributing developer
Contributing developer
Posts: 1755
Joined: 2018-10-28, 19:56
Location: Georgia

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by athenian200 » 2022-05-14, 22:32

TheRealMaestro wrote:
2022-05-14, 22:09
It would be funny, if Microsoft’s leeching gets bad enough, if Google closes Chromium’s further development to try to starve it.
That's a possibility. Chromium is under a BSD license, and that means Google could close off the codebase at any time. It's also why Microsoft hasn't had to release the source code to Microsoft Edge, although I hear they have contributed some of their code back to upstream to the Chromium project. If Microsoft's engineers are actively contributing code upstream, I'm not sure Google will see it as leeching.

The main problem for Google if they close off Chromium development is that they lose all the contributions to the codebase outside of Google, which makes developing Chromium a lot more expensive and forces them to hire more engineers. Right now, they have a ton of downstream browser developers contributing code upstream to them, and that flow will stop if they have to close development. In addition to that, it also creates an incentive for Microsoft, Brave, or someone else to become new stewards of the open source version of Chromium and put a lot of effort into trying to rival, reverse engineer, or beat Google's closed version. The open source community tends to react badly when access to a previously open codebase is restricted in any way, much less totally closed off. They do not care what the license says, they expect full transparency and commit history, and look askance at anything short of that. And that would be a PR nightmare for Google.
"The Athenians, however, represent the unity of these opposites; in them, mind or spirit has emerged from the Theban subjectivity without losing itself in the Spartan objectivity of ethical life. With the Athenians, the rights of the State and of the individual found as perfect a union as was possible at all at the level of the Greek spirit." -- Hegel's philosophy of Mind

jangdonggun1234
Fanatic
Fanatic
Posts: 104
Joined: 2013-06-06, 01:29

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by jangdonggun1234 » 2022-05-15, 03:08

andyprough wrote:
2022-05-13, 20:02
athenian200 wrote:
2022-05-13, 19:23
Google seems to really hate Edge far more than they hate Firefox.
Chrome has lost about 6% to 10% of the browser market share over the past two years, while Edge has been gaining market share the fastest. There's quite a few reasons ($$$$$$$) why Google hates Edge.
This is a good thing or I would say best thing, because Chrome being the King of the web is bad. They can freely add or remove web Standards, like they did with WebComponents.

They need someone to be their competitor.

User avatar
moonbat
Knows the dark side
Knows the dark side
Posts: 5846
Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by moonbat » 2022-05-15, 07:22

athenian200 wrote:
2022-05-13, 19:23
Google seems to really hate Edge far more than they hate Firefox
Firefox is their sockpuppet controlled opposition to ward off accusations of having a browser monopoly, they have no reason to hate it even apart from the fact of its marketshare being in the low single digits.
"One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them and in the darkness BIND them."

Image
KDE Neon on a Slimbook Excalibur (Ryzen 7 8845HS, 64 GB RAM)
AutoPageColor|PermissionsPlus|PMPlayer|Pure URL|RecordRewind|TextFX
Jabber: moonbat@hot-chili.net

jangdonggun1234
Fanatic
Fanatic
Posts: 104
Joined: 2013-06-06, 01:29

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by jangdonggun1234 » 2022-05-15, 08:44

Firefox just exists nowadays to make Chrome looks even better, it's literally a dead browser, Chrome's clone.
Just look at Firefox Android, they have literally total of 7 addons (minus dups and useless addons like Adguard/Adblock is worse uBlock, and who needs Google Search Fixer) lmao. And addons were the main reason why so many people used Firefox in the past, they got rid of many addons (ImgLikeOpera, CustomButtons...) by implementing WebExtension and lost most of their userbase.

User avatar
Eduardo Lucas
Moon lover
Moon lover
Posts: 94
Joined: 2021-07-08, 13:08
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by Eduardo Lucas » 2022-05-16, 09:39

jangdonggun1234 wrote:
2022-05-15, 08:44
Firefox just exists nowadays to make Chrome looks even better, it's literally a dead browser, Chrome's clone.
Just look at Firefox Android, they have literally total of 7 addons (minus dups and useless addons like Adguard/Adblock is worse uBlock, and who needs Google Search Fixer) lmao. And addons were the main reason why so many people used Firefox in the past, they got rid of many addons (ImgLikeOpera, CustomButtons...) by implementing WebExtension and lost most of their userbase.
I think this has a lot of sense. If you think mobile is vastly more crowded than desktop or other kinds of small computers and that their extension ecosystem is a tiny bunch, it makes me feel like Pale Moon has been successfull in not transitioning to WebExtensions and that it was, again, a smart decision (as historically it always was) to a software or hardware manufacturer to take backwards compatibility very seriously. I think the project could have disappeared as well if it happened and if PM didn't decide to be a hard fork, because i remember firefox forks in the past (late 00s) were so, so many, and they simply ceased to exist, maybe because they lost their differentiation factor in a sense of being significantly distinct from the main software they derived from and fill needs and usecases (as well as being a distinct vision) that are lacking in.
Last edited by Eduardo Lucas on 2022-05-16, 10:18, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
Moonchild
Project founder
Project founder
Posts: 39276
Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
Location: Sweden

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by Moonchild » 2022-05-16, 09:42

Eduardo Lucas wrote:
2022-05-16, 09:39
because i remember firefox forks in the past (late 00s) were so, so many, and they simply ceased to exist.
They weren't forks; they were rebuilds. They didn't actually have (much of) their own development, and would just follow whatever Mozilla did with each version, so there was no real identity there and no chance of deviating from the course set by Mozilla.
"Praise from a narcissistic person is always a poison dart. They don't share the stage, so discernment matters." - Dr. Ramani
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite

User avatar
Eduardo Lucas
Moon lover
Moon lover
Posts: 94
Joined: 2021-07-08, 13:08
Location: São Paulo, Brazil

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by Eduardo Lucas » 2022-05-16, 09:45

Moonchild wrote:
2022-05-16, 09:42
Eduardo Lucas wrote:
2022-05-16, 09:39
because i remember firefox forks in the past (late 00s) were so, so many, and they simply ceased to exist.
They weren't forks; they were rebuilds. They didn't actually have (much of) their own development, and would just follow whatever Mozilla did with each version, so there was no real identity there and no chance of deviating from the course set by Mozilla.
Yes, i think my memory is not helping me, as i was something around 11 or 12 at the time and i had terrible english skills, so they were just rebuilds that used a different name from firefox.

User avatar
Moonchild
Project founder
Project founder
Posts: 39276
Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
Location: Sweden

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by Moonchild » 2022-05-16, 10:07

Eduardo Lucas wrote:
2022-05-16, 09:45
Yes, i think my memory is not helping me, as i was something around 11 or 12 at the time and i had terrible english skills, so they were just rebuilds that used a different name from firefox.
Usually with some different configuration/preferences/home page, but essentially just renamed Firefox, yes.
"Praise from a narcissistic person is always a poison dart. They don't share the stage, so discernment matters." - Dr. Ramani
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite

User avatar
moonbat
Knows the dark side
Knows the dark side
Posts: 5846
Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45

Re: Google is at it again - blatant Chrome pushing

Post by moonbat » 2022-05-17, 06:14

Moonchild wrote:
2022-05-16, 10:07
Usually with some different configuration/preferences/home page, but essentially just renamed Firefox, yes.
There was one called Flock, that was hyped up a lot. It integrated support for all the popular s⃥o⃥c⃥i⃥a⃥l⃥ ⃥m⃥e⃥d⃥i⃥a⃥ online communities of the day, but you could achieve a similar effect on regular Firefox using the then official extensions of these sites.
"One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them and in the darkness BIND them."

Image
KDE Neon on a Slimbook Excalibur (Ryzen 7 8845HS, 64 GB RAM)
AutoPageColor|PermissionsPlus|PMPlayer|Pure URL|RecordRewind|TextFX
Jabber: moonbat@hot-chili.net