Ask me anything!

Have a question you always wanted to ask Moonchild but never did? Now's your chance!
From 2026-03-08 to 2026-03-15 I'll be open to any question by the community, after which I'll provide answers.

Go here to participate: https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=33222

JPEGXL info...

General project discussion.
Use this as a last resort if your topic does not fit in any of the other boards but it still on-topic.
Forum rules
This General Discussion board is meant for topics that are still relevant to Pale Moon, web browsers, browser tech, UXP applications, and related, but don't have a more fitting board available.

Please stick to the relevance of this forum here, which focuses on everything around the Pale Moon project and its user community. "Random" subjects don't belong here, and should be posted in the Off-Topic board.
User avatar
Moonchild
Project founder
Project founder
Posts: 38961
Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
Location: Sweden

Re: JPEGXL info...

Post by Moonchild » 2026-01-30, 07:39

That's the nature of the encoding, that's not artefacting.
But if you're just going to reject anything not lossless as "horrible artefacts" then you're just being hyperbolic and there's no point arguing, so I wish you a good day.
"There is no point in arguing with an idiot, because then you're both idiots." - Anonymous
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
Top

Return to “General Discussion”