Welp, there goes VORAPIS.

General project discussion.
Use this as a last resort if your topic does not fit in any of the other boards but it still on-topic.
Forum rules
This General Discussion board is meant for topics that are still relevant to Pale Moon, web browsers, browser tech, UXP applications, and related, but don't have a more fitting board available.

Please stick to the relevance of this forum here, which focuses on everything around the Pale Moon project and its user community. "Random" subjects don't belong here, and should be posted in the Off-Topic board.
User avatar
Night Wing
Knows the dark side
Knows the dark side
Posts: 5536
Joined: 2011-10-03, 10:19
Location: Piney Woods of Southeast Texas, USA

Re: Welp, there goes VORAPIS.

Post by Night Wing » 2024-10-17, 15:32

Off-topic:
frostknight wrote:
2024-10-17, 11:50
Night Wing wrote:
2024-10-17, 11:22
I had never heard of Nadeko before. So I went over to the site to check it out. I was not impressed.

As far as I can tell, Nadeko offers 1080p for it's highest defintion viewing mode. The reason I say this is because I have a lot of surfing videos where I can view them in 2160p 4K high definition on YouTube.
Honestly, I don't really know why anyone cares about high definition viewing mode.

I am happy with 360p.

1080p? Not needed, matter of fact, 360p takes way less space up if you store it on computer. And if runs faster on the web.

So I kind of don't understand your interest in higher definition.

To each his own I guess? ;)
You only see things through your eyes. Ever hear the phrase, "Walk a mile in my shoes?"

When I was 28 years old, my eyesight started to go bad in both my right and left eyes. So bad in fact I was relegated to wearing trifocal glasses at that young age.

When I was 69 years old, I could no longer see things clearly enough to even write a check for payment of goods while wearing trifocal glasses. I had to carry around a small magnifying glass to write checks.

When this started happening, I went to an ophthalmologist to see if he could do anything for me. He told me I was now out of range for trifocals. I would need quadfocal glasses. There was only one problem. No company in the ENTIRE world makes quadfocal glasses. And I also had a cataract in each eye. My world was getting real blurry vision wise.

This is why I view EVERY video on YouTube in the highest definition mode offered for that video.

Then last May when I was 74 years old, I went for my annual eyes exam. My ophthalmologist told me both cataracts had grown large enough to be taken out surgically. So on May 16th of 2024 I had my left eye operated on and then on May 30th, I had my right eye operated on.

Fast forward to today.

I have 20/15 vision in my left eye and 20/20 vision with my right eye "far" distance wise. I chose far distance lenses to see things clearly mainly because when I was surfing with my poor eyesight, I always saw the tell tale shape of an eight foot bull shark at about five yards from my longboard which can be a little scary. With both of my now surgically repaired eyes, I can see the tell tale shape of a bull shark at twenty yards when I am surfing my 9'3" longboard.

When one is surfing, bull sharks where I surf are common because there are many of them around. It is not wise to run over a bull shark and hit the shark with the 10.5" fin on the underside of the tail end of my longboard. The shark will get "pissed" and might retaliate with it's mouth full of very sharp teeth.

With my new eyesight, since I can see the shape of a bull shark at twenty yards from my longboard, I can steer my longboard around the shark and not run over it.

Since I chose far distance lenses for both eyes, I have to wear "reading glasses" (cheaters) that I can get at my local grocery store to write checks and do paperwork. I think the prescription is 1.25 if I am not mistaken. Cost is about $10.00 (US dollars).

In closing.

I can tell from your comments above you don't have very poor vision. Because if you did, you wouldn't make those comments above. As one gets older or has an accident which affects their eyes, their vision starts to see things with a "blurry" view of the world.

One last item, as one gets older, there is a 50/50 chance you will have a cataract in one eye or maybe in both of your eyes. Then you will change your (pardon the pun) "viewpoint" when you want to see things "clearly" and you cannot.
MX Linux 23.6 (Libretto) Xfce w/Pale Moon, Waterfox, Firefox
Linux Debian 13.1 (Trixie) Xfce w/Pale Moon, Waterfox, Firefox

User avatar
frostknight
Astronaut
Astronaut
Posts: 740
Joined: 2022-08-10, 02:25

Re: Welp, there goes VORAPIS.

Post by frostknight » 2024-10-18, 09:22

andyprough wrote:
2024-10-17, 13:34
@NightWing cannot see very well, so for someone like that the lower video quality from invidious is pretty worthless.
Oh, I had not known this.

Is 1080p not enough then?

That is actually a good reason.
Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. Feelings are not facts
If you wish to be humbled, try to exalt yourself long term If you wish to be exalted, try to humble yourself long term
Favourite operating systems: Hyperbola Devuan OpenBSD
Say NO to Fascism and Corporatism as much as possible!
Also, Peace Be With us All!

User avatar
Night Wing
Knows the dark side
Knows the dark side
Posts: 5536
Joined: 2011-10-03, 10:19
Location: Piney Woods of Southeast Texas, USA

Re: Welp, there goes VORAPIS.

Post by Night Wing » 2024-10-18, 10:54

Off-topic:
@ frostknight

Most videos I watch, they usually offer 1080 as their highest definition mode on YouTube where I can see "details" without any problems for both of my eyes. When it comes to seeing details in YT videos, the higher 2160p mode is what I prefer. Many of my surfing videos I have saved as bookmarks offer 2160p 4K high definition mode.

I also have "sleep" videos for helping me get to sleep when I am over tired and just cannot get to sleep on my own. I need the "sound" of these videos. I have my 32" external monitor set to go "blank" at 10 minutes of time so the bedroom is completely dark then, but the sound still plays. The entire computer will go to sleep at 60 minutes. BTW, I watch all of my videos in "full screen".

When it comes to my sleep videos, I do not need the highest definition mode since I am in bed trying to sleep in a bedroom which I have turned into a computer room. The bed in this room has a full size bed in it.

I will show you what a difference there is between 1080 and 2160p 4K with an example of one of my sleep videos which I use for sound and I will use this video below as an example.

For this video, I have the sound on my external speakers (with a sub woofer) turned down so my brain can hear the sound which will help put me to sleep, but not so loud the sound will keep me from falling to sleep. It is a balancing act sound wise.

The video below is of ocean waves washing up on a tropical beach. It is offered in definition modes from 144p all the way up to 2160p 4K. If your computer is a desktop tower computer with a very good graphics card in it, you should be offered the settings from 144p to 2160p 4K. If on the other hand you are using a laptop, the graphics chip in the laptop might not show all of these settings.

When you are viewing the video, look at the island in the background with all of the green leaves on the trees growing on the island. At 720, the leaves are blurry and not distinct. Ditto for 1080. Better, but not to my liking. At 2160p 4K, the leaves on the island will stand out "detail" wise.

And "andyprough" is correct. Invidious and Nadeko videos are basically useless to me when I need to see "details" in a video and this is why for me, YouTube is still "King Of The Hill" definition mode wise.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nta1YhicoGw
MX Linux 23.6 (Libretto) Xfce w/Pale Moon, Waterfox, Firefox
Linux Debian 13.1 (Trixie) Xfce w/Pale Moon, Waterfox, Firefox

User avatar
moonbat
Knows the dark side
Knows the dark side
Posts: 5688
Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45

Re: Welp, there goes VORAPIS.

Post by moonbat » 2024-10-18, 13:09

Invidious and other frontends are anyway useless for anyone for whom Youtube is more than a substitute for broadcast TV and who actually make use of account dependent features like playlists, commenting and recommendations.
"One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them and in the darkness BIND them."

Image
KDE Neon on a Slimbook Excalibur (Ryzen 7 8845HS, 64 GB RAM)
AutoPageColor|PermissionsPlus|PMPlayer|Pure URL|RecordRewind|TextFX
Jabber: moonbat@hot-chili.net