Tutanota recommends Pale Moon among other browsers

[Mæstro]

My former email provider has noticed us fondly. Its list of recommended browsers is split into two parts: mainstream and alternative browsers. There are four in the former class, which is listed first; I am pleased to say that we nonetheless enjoy the top place in our respective class. Regrettably, the browser’s name appears in camel case sometimes, but the good word is still welcome. More outsiders lately seem able to recognise us for what we are, not just ‘outdated Firefox’.

[athenian200]

My former email provider has noticed us fondly. Its list of recommended browsers is split into two parts: mainstream and alternative browsers. There are four in the former class, which is listed first; I am pleased to say that we nonetheless enjoy the top place in our respective class. Regrettably, the browser’s name appears in camel case sometimes, but the good word is still welcome. More outsiders lately seem able to recognise us for what we are, not just ‘outdated Firefox’.

I noticed they're referring to our extensions as "non-Firefox extensions," which is interesting. I wonder if that means a lot of people no longer know that Firefox used to use a different extension format, and now think WebExtensions with Manifest V2 is a "Firefox extension," while Manifest V3 is a "Chrome extension"? And forgot the original meaning of those terms... meaning what we're using is new to them, and they think we invented XUL extensions.

[moonbat]

they think we invented XUL extensions.

At this point unfortunately there's nobody else but us with UXP. Sometimes I wish the original creators of XUL would join our project. Also, given how Mozilla has totally disavowed XUL extensions, we may as well capitalize on it and showcase examples of things that can't be dreamt of with web extensions