TLS 1.0 and 1.1 deprecation.

General project discussion
Forum rules
This General Discussion board is meant for topics that are still relevant to Pale Moon, web browsers, browser tech, and related, but don't have a more fitting board available.

Please stick to the relevance of this forum here, which focuses on everything around the Pale Moon project and its user community. "Random" subjects don't belong here, and should be posted in the Off-Topic board.
User avatar
New Tobin Paradigm
Off-Topic Sheriff
Off-Topic Sheriff
Posts: 6681
Joined: 2012-10-09, 19:37
Location: Sector 001

Re: TLS 1.0 and 1.1 deprecation.

Post by New Tobin Paradigm » 2020-01-11, 14:27

What's your point?
Image
The Enrichment Center reminds you that the Weighted Companion Cube cannot speak.
In the event that the weighted companion cube does speak, the Enrichment Center urges you to disregard its advice.

https://binaryoutcast.com/ | http://thereisonlyxul.org/ | Freenode #binaryoutcast

User avatar
therube
Board Warrior
Board Warrior
Posts: 1166
Joined: 2018-06-08, 17:02

Re: TLS 1.0 and 1.1 deprecation.

Post by therube » 2020-01-11, 14:44

Point is, if some cares to test their browser, they can fire up those links & see how things behave, currently, or may behave, in the future.

User avatar
Moonchild
Pale Moon guru
Pale Moon guru
Posts: 25754
Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
Location: 58°2'16"N 14°58'31"E
Contact:

Re: TLS 1.0 and 1.1 deprecation.

Post by Moonchild » 2020-01-11, 16:47

Legacy Cryptography (Moderate Risk)
If your browser connects to one of these sites, your web traffic is probably safe from attackers in the near future. However, your connections to some sites might not be using the strongest possible security. Your browser may use these settings in order to connect to some older sites.
Subdomain Result Secure Result?
tls-v1-0 connected 🆗 OKAY
tls-v1-1 connected 🆗 OKAY
cbc connected 🆗 OKAY
3des cannot connect ✅ YES
dh2048 cannot connect ✅ YES
"There will be times when the position you advocate, no matter how well framed and supported, will not be accepted by the public simply because you are who you are." -- Merrill Rose
Image

User avatar
moonbat
Board Warrior
Board Warrior
Posts: 1076
Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45
Location: Australia

Re: TLS 1.0 and 1.1 deprecation.

Post by moonbat » 2020-01-12, 03:14

Moonchild wrote:
2019-10-03, 11:30
I honestly don't get it. these warnings should be sent to server administrators as part of evangelism; what good is it to bother browser users with it?
Maybe they (Google/Mozilla) want to force the issue by breaking support for it in the browser so that website operators are compelled to change when their users are inconvenienced.
"One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them and in the darkness BIND them."

Linux Mint 19.3 Xfce x64 on HP i5 laptop with 4 GB RAM, always latest versions of PM & Basilisk unless specified.

User avatar
Isengrim
Board Warrior
Board Warrior
Posts: 1058
Joined: 2015-09-08, 22:54
Location: 127.0.0.1
Contact:

Re: TLS 1.0 and 1.1 deprecation.

Post by Isengrim » 2020-01-12, 03:30

moonbat wrote:
2020-01-12, 03:14
Maybe they (Google/Mozilla) want to force the issue by breaking support for it in the browser so that website operators are compelled to change when their users are inconvenienced.
This was my thought as well. Make it look like a problem with the site and users will complain about the site rather than the browser.
Linux Mint 19.2 Cinnamon (64-bit), Windows 7 (64-bit), Windows 10 build 1803 (64-bit)
"As long as there is someone who will appreciate the work involved in the creation, the effort is time well spent." ~ Tetsuzou Kamadani, Cave Story

Post Reply