Pale Moon included in a browser Top-10 list

General project discussion

Moderator: satrow

Forum rules
This General Discussion board is meant for topics that are still relevant to Pale Moon, web browsers, browser tech, and related, but don't have a more fitting board available.

Please stick to the relevance of this forum here, which focuses on everything around the Pale Moon project and its user community. "Random" subjects don't belong here, and should be posted in the Off-Topic board.
User avatar
Pale Moon Rising
Knows the dark side
Knows the dark side
Posts: 3382
Joined: 2015-10-06, 16:59
Location: Los Angeles CA USA

Pale Moon included in a browser Top-10 list

Unread post by Pale Moon Rising » 2019-09-24, 05:58

Found a website listing Pale Moon in a Top-10 browser list: Best Web Browsers for Windows 10. :thumbup: This has probably been posted as the article is over 1½ years old -- but I thought I'd post the link just in case it was overlooked. ;)
Current Pale Moon(x86) Release | WIN10 | I5 CPU, 1.7 GHz, 6GB RAM, 500GB HD w/ 20GB SSD

Good judgment comes from experience and a lot of that comes from bad judgment. - Will Rogers

Knowing Pale Moon is indisputably #1 is defined by knowing the totality of browsers. - Pale Moon Rising

User avatar
moonbat
Keeps coming back
Keeps coming back
Posts: 755
Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45
Location: Australia

Re: Pale Moon included in a browser Top-10 list

Unread post by moonbat » 2019-09-24, 06:37

It's written by a clueless idiot.

Initially, based on Firefox, this web browser has taken a different route lately in its quest to maintain features that Mozilla opted to drop over the years. This made it a safe place for these Firefox users.
Ok, so far so good...
That said, while this is still a competent web browser, high on customization potential and excellent ease of use, it has started to falter when it comes to performance and overall feature set. Many modern web browsers like Chrome, Vivaldi, and, of course, Firefox Quantum, has it beat these days.
How? No elaboration obviously.
To complicate matters further, Mozilla switching to the WebExtensions format means that the thousands of classic add-ons that were available on Firefox no longer work on Pale Moon. The browser does offer its extensions, themes, and search plugins, but it’s not quite that.
So if Mozilla switches to WebExtensions, that means classic addons will no longer work...on Pale Moon? Which you, dear author, previously acknowledged for preserving compatibility? Pass the bong, that's some great stuff you're smoking.
Cons - feels like an old version of Firefox
That's a feature, not a bug, you idiot. 'Old' here equals usable on a desktop, not dumbed down for mobile.
Cons - Reduced selection of extensions due to format change
Never mind the thousands of classic extensions available via CAA over 10 years that you'd have heard of if you did your homework.
Off-topic:
How many WebExtensions exist now, compared to what's on CAA?
"One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them and in the darkness BIND them."

Linux Mint 19.2 Xfce x64 on HP i5 laptop with 4 GB RAM, always latest versions of PM & Basilisk unless specified.

vannilla
Astronaut
Astronaut
Posts: 695
Joined: 2018-05-05, 13:29

Re: Pale Moon included in a browser Top-10 list

Unread post by vannilla » 2019-09-24, 08:25

moonbat wrote:
2019-09-24, 06:37
Off-topic:
How many WebExtensions exist now, compared to what's on CAA?
Off-topic:
Actually, the numbers are relatively close.
But most WebExts are copies of copies of copies of other extensions, while CAA has some more diversity.

User avatar
moonbat
Keeps coming back
Keeps coming back
Posts: 755
Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45
Location: Australia

Re: Pale Moon included in a browser Top-10 list

Unread post by moonbat » 2019-09-24, 09:06

vannilla wrote:
2019-09-24, 08:25
Off-topic:
Actually, the numbers are relatively close.
But most WebExts are copies of copies of copies of other extensions, while CAA has some more diversity.
Off-topic:
I wonder how many of them could as well be implemented as user scripts for Greasemonkey/Tampermonkey etc. Since WE has as good as castrated any sort of browser customizations and left only website customization as an option.
"One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them and in the darkness BIND them."

Linux Mint 19.2 Xfce x64 on HP i5 laptop with 4 GB RAM, always latest versions of PM & Basilisk unless specified.

User avatar
Moonchild
Pale Moon guru
Pale Moon guru
Posts: 24869
Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
Location: 58°2'16"N 14°58'31"E
Contact:

Re: Pale Moon included in a browser Top-10 list

Unread post by Moonchild » 2019-09-24, 10:12

Off-topic:
moonbat wrote:
2019-09-24, 09:06
Since WE has as good as castrated any sort of browser customizations and left only website customization as an option.
... look at the name. WEB extensions. They are to extend the web (= content). They are not BROWSER extensions. So by definition they will manipulate web content as primary goal, and most likely any such thing can be done with greasemonkey.
"If you want to build a better world for yourself, you have to be willing to build one for everybody." -- Coyote Osborne
Image

User avatar
moonbat
Keeps coming back
Keeps coming back
Posts: 755
Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45
Location: Australia

Re: Pale Moon included in a browser Top-10 list

Unread post by moonbat » 2019-09-24, 11:36

And even the web customization will be gradually whittled away, following Chrome's lead in interfering with adblocking capabilities.
"One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them and in the darkness BIND them."

Linux Mint 19.2 Xfce x64 on HP i5 laptop with 4 GB RAM, always latest versions of PM & Basilisk unless specified.

User avatar
MickelC
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: 2018-11-19, 13:51

Re: Pale Moon included in a browser Top-10 list

Unread post by MickelC » 2019-09-25, 14:35

That is really nice. But does anyone here have used Palemoon on ps4?

Post Reply