Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.

Discussions about the development and maturation of the Unified XUL Platform (UXP).
Warning: may contain highly-technical topics.

Moderators: trava90, satrow

RMK99
Hobby Astronomer
Hobby Astronomer
Posts: 22
Joined: 2017-06-27, 23:02

Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.

Unread post by RMK99 » 2018-06-27, 20:48

Hello.

Why Pale Moon 28 x64 has better performance on benchmarks that Firefox 63 x64 ? Mozilla is sleeping or what ?

User avatar
therube
Keeps coming back
Keeps coming back
Posts: 962
Joined: 2018-06-08, 17:02

Re: Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.

Unread post by therube » 2018-06-27, 23:51

Just what "benchmarks" are these?
(And then like, why does it matter?)

And that said, PM 28 does have better performance then PM 27 - in real life.

User avatar
Nigaikaze
Board Warrior
Board Warrior
Posts: 1072
Joined: 2014-02-02, 22:15
Location: Chicago, IL, USA

Re: Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.

Unread post by Nigaikaze » 2018-06-28, 00:06

Nichi nichi kore ko jitsu = Every day is a good day.

User avatar
Moonraker
Keeps coming back
Keeps coming back
Posts: 995
Joined: 2015-09-30, 23:02
Location: Lincolnshire.UK.

Re: Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.

Unread post by Moonraker » 2018-06-28, 12:16

The only benchmark which i take into consideration is what i can see and do on my personal computer.split second differences are not noticed by a user so one browser is a nano-second quicker than another...so what.?

We live in a mathematical society and people love figures and comparisons,however these facts and figures are non-conclusive in regard to the choice of a browser.
Those browsers were not tested on my computer so why should people give creedence to figures which were attained by tests on another machine?
Xenial puppy linux 32-bit.
Pale moon 28.5.0.

RMK99
Hobby Astronomer
Hobby Astronomer
Posts: 22
Joined: 2017-06-27, 23:02

Re: Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.

Unread post by RMK99 » 2018-06-28, 19:12

therube wrote:Just what "benchmarks" are these?
(And then like, why does it matter?)

And that said, PM 28 does have better performance then PM 27 - in real life.
Exampel Base Mark:

Firefox 61 x64: 260 point + a lot lags
Firefox 63 x64: 300points + a lot lags
Pale Moon 27 x64: 470points + fast and no lags
Pale Moon 28 x64: 690ppints + fast and no lags
Chrome 69 x64: 1010points + very fast and no lags.

And some site does not work correct in Firefox and Pale Moon 27.
Last edited by RMK99 on 2018-06-28, 19:21, edited 6 times in total.

User avatar
therube
Keeps coming back
Keeps coming back
Posts: 962
Joined: 2018-06-08, 17:02

Re: Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.

Unread post by therube » 2018-06-28, 20:21

What are "points" & "lags"?

User avatar
oTPS0
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: 2015-02-28, 18:55
Contact:

Re: Pale Moon 28 vs Firefox 63. Performance.

Unread post by oTPS0 » 2018-06-30, 16:19

RMK99 wrote:
therube wrote:Just what "benchmarks" are these?
(And then like, why does it matter?)

And that said, PM 28 does have better performance then PM 27 - in real life.
Exampel Base Mark:
Again, what benchmark(Is it https://web.basemark.com/)& why does it matter⁉️
Last edited by oTPS0 on 2018-06-30, 16:23, edited 1 time in total.

Locked