I added an FAQ section to the Basilisk site. Let me know if there are any other questions that you think I should add. Thanks!
https://basilisk-browser.org/faq.shtml
FAQ Section Added to Basilisk Site
Moderator: Basilisk-Dev
-
- Lunatic
- Posts: 323
- Joined: 2022-03-23, 16:41
- Location: Chamber of Secrets
-
- Knows the dark side
- Posts: 4984
- Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45
Re: FAQ Section Added to Basilisk Site
I'd say remove the highlighted bit. Let users of Serpent stick to asking for help from its maintainer.If you need support for these browsers, please do not ask us for support unless you have verified that the issue you are encountering also occurs on official Basilisk builds. Serpent is not Basilisk. Basilisk is not Serpent.
"One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them and in the darkness BIND them."
Linux Mint 21 Xfce x64 on HP i5-5200 laptop, 12 GB RAM.
AutoPageColor|PermissionsPlus|PMPlayer|Pure URL|RecordRewind|TextFX
Linux Mint 21 Xfce x64 on HP i5-5200 laptop, 12 GB RAM.
AutoPageColor|PermissionsPlus|PMPlayer|Pure URL|RecordRewind|TextFX
-
- Moon Magic practitioner
- Posts: 2860
- Joined: 2012-06-28, 01:20
Re: FAQ Section Added to Basilisk Site
I think there's a typo. The question for: "Does Basilisk Windows 2000/XP/Vista?" Shouldn't the word "support" be in there?
Why, if the problem also occurs in Basilisk?
-
- Knows the dark side
- Posts: 4984
- Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45
Re: FAQ Section Added to Basilisk Site
Why should Basilisk-dev set himself up to support a browser other than the one he maintains, and why can't roytam do this for his own build? We've already had New Moon users showing up here despite being told not to.
"One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them and in the darkness BIND them."
Linux Mint 21 Xfce x64 on HP i5-5200 laptop, 12 GB RAM.
AutoPageColor|PermissionsPlus|PMPlayer|Pure URL|RecordRewind|TextFX
Linux Mint 21 Xfce x64 on HP i5-5200 laptop, 12 GB RAM.
AutoPageColor|PermissionsPlus|PMPlayer|Pure URL|RecordRewind|TextFX
-
- Moon Magic practitioner
- Posts: 2860
- Joined: 2012-06-28, 01:20
Re: FAQ Section Added to Basilisk Site
If the (potential) problem also exists in Basilisk, then the Basilisk dev is fixing his own browser, with the side effect it fixes a third-party one based on it. I would say that to refuse to fix a problem in Basilisk because it was first found elsewhere, would be like cutting off your nose to spite your face. Just my humble opinion.
-
- Lunatic
- Posts: 323
- Joined: 2022-03-23, 16:41
- Location: Chamber of Secrets
Re: FAQ Section Added to Basilisk Site
Fixed, thanks.
While I agree with not supporting roytam's browser as that is not my project, the wording here is specifically saying "If the issue occurs in Basilisk then let us know". In other words, the bug is legitimate and needs to be fixed because it affects users of Basilisk.