Basilisk display sharpness/contrast vs Pale Moon
Posted: 2018-04-16, 14:15
On my HP laptop, Basilisk screen display looks just like Firefox, fine but lacking in apparent sharpness and certainly contrast compared to Pale Moon's excellent display. With Pale Moon, black fonts are really black, showing much better contrast than Basilisk/Firefox (black fonts are grayish, background white a bit bluish compared with Pale Moon). Pale Moon's display is just richer.
I've been searching through about:config differences between Basilisk and Pale Moon, thinking there's a preference I could set which would help Basilisk match Pale Moon's display, but that doesn't seem to work.
I'm wondering if it's some OS-related smoothing that Pale Moon somehow overrides. Pale Moon's fonts seem well-formed though, at least to my eyes.
I'm running Windows 10 Pro 1709 32-bit with latest 32-bit browsers.
Any hints? Is there a tweak for Basilisk (and FIrefox?) to make the display match Pale Moon's?
I've been searching through about:config differences between Basilisk and Pale Moon, thinking there's a preference I could set which would help Basilisk match Pale Moon's display, but that doesn't seem to work.
I'm wondering if it's some OS-related smoothing that Pale Moon somehow overrides. Pale Moon's fonts seem well-formed though, at least to my eyes.
I'm running Windows 10 Pro 1709 32-bit with latest 32-bit browsers.
Any hints? Is there a tweak for Basilisk (and FIrefox?) to make the display match Pale Moon's?