Pale Moon forum

Hello,

I had in Basilisk Czech language pack (only FF ver. 53 works) , but after update to the latest version it shows XUL problem again (I can't start Basilisk anymore) . Where is the problem now? Thank you in advance.

Here is the error window what only shows now:

There are no language packs for basilisk.
Start in safe mode and remove the Firefox pack.

I removed language addon from profile folder. But why in the previous version, FF language pack worked and now not?

SGvagon wrote:I removed language addon from profile folder. But why in the previous version, FF language pack worked and now not?

See https://basilisk-browser.org/releasenotes.shtml
The following features have been added to Basilisk (2017-12-28+): The (Toolkit) Error Console (which it's not in Firefox 50+).

So the error console is now a problem with installing this Language pack? Isn't implement in the pack?
And will developer team prepare language packs for Basilisk in the future?

At this point.. There will be no language packs.. Maybe in the future but it will likely be late in the year..

Basilisk is almost Firefox but not quite!

Ok thank you for reply. I have a problem with MSN decoder in Palemoon (I had 2nd laptop and there is same issue with playing HTML5 videos viewtopic.php?f=29&t=17840 , sometimes lagging/less FPS , eats FPS in games and still sometimes blinking to black screen or drains CPU ) , but in Basilisk videos works perfectly (with games too) . So I am trying set Basilisk to a main browser now. But Palemoon is Palemoon, faster, lighter, more intuitive, maybe more stable... It's hard to switch another browser after (5 or more) years.

Dude, don't threadspill. it's annoying and makes keeping track of topics very difficult for the people who try to assist.

We don't have language packs, and currently have no plans for them for Basilisk. You can't and shouldn't try to use Firefox ones (you're lucky one of them worked to begin with, it was probably part-broken, just not in the main UI).

It's undecided at this point if it's worth doing this for Basilisk, at all. It takes a lot of capacity to properly provide language packs and unless Basilisk really takes off (which I doubt at this point) there's simply no justification for the overhead needed.

It is certainly true
bind the language pack capacities.

I would welcome it
if you would consider it.

Palemoon is good, I just can not get my users
in my forum to use it.

Many have grown up with Firefox,
Basilisk comes very close to Firefox.

Since there are not a few users who the new Firefox 58.0.2
dislike , Baselikt would be a good alternative with the right one
Language pack

See my post right above yours.
It's there fore a reason.

It was already explained there,
that there are no plans for language packs
at this point in time.

We can't considers it
because it requires a significant investment
in both time and expertise