I'm evaluating the other ff legacy fork "Waterfox" - available only in memory-hungry x64, but enables e10s. The current ff56-based test build includes aa long list of security backports from ff57+ ... are these included in Basilisk, too? Or is the forked code base so different that it doesn't apply?
https://www.reddit.com/r/waterfox/comme ... ns_please/
Security backports from ff57+ to Basilisk? Topic is solved
Moderator: Basilisk-Dev
-
- Board Warrior
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: 2014-02-02, 22:15
- Location: Chicagoland
Re: Security backports from ff57+ to Basilisk?
According to the Basilisk release notes ...
... yes, FF57+ security issues are being ported over if applicable.Fixed several security bugs: CVE-2017-7837, CVE-2017-7832, CVE-2017-7830, CVE-2017-7835, CVE-2017-7831, CVE-2017-7838, CVE-2017-7839, CVE-2017-7828, CVE-2017-7840, and several others from Firefox 57 that do not have a CVE designation.
Nichi nichi kore ko jitsu = Every day is a good day.
Re: Security backports from ff57+ to Basilisk?
Thanks a lot, I missed that particular page. This maintenance makes Basilisk very attractive to use as a main web browser, doesn't it? Even though it's by no means the successor to Pale MoonNigaikaze wrote:According to the Basilisk release notes ...
![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)