ublock question

Board for discussions around the Basilisk web browser.

Moderator: Basilisk-Dev

GMforker

Re: ublock question

Unread post by GMforker » 2017-11-30, 09:18

ianas wrote:I tried a few other webext based addons like tampermonkey and it did not work with basilisk
Tampermonkey - it detects (in "rea/common.js") it as Firefox 55.
Basilisk - not implemented: bug #1258360

If you want, you can report it.

User avatar
gracious1
Keeps coming back
Keeps coming back
Posts: 891
Joined: 2016-05-15, 05:00
Location: humid upstate NY

Re: ublock question

Unread post by gracious1 » 2017-12-01, 02:48

GMforker wrote:
ianas wrote:I tried a few other webext based addons like tampermonkey and it did not work with basilisk
Tampermonkey - it detects (in "rea/common.js") it as Firefox 55.
Basilisk - not implemented: bug #1258360

If you want, you can report it.
Hey there, I'm just trying to follow what you just said. The bug you cited was fixed in Firefox, but Basilisk still has this bug, and so you are advising ianas to open an issue at github to have the bug likewise fixed for Basilisk?
20 July 1969 🌗 Apollo 11 🌓 "One small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind." 🚀

GMforker

Re: ublock question

Unread post by GMforker » 2017-12-01, 06:05

gracious1 wrote:The bug you cited was fixed in Firefox, but Basilisk still has this bug, and so you are advising ianas to open an issue at github to have the bug likewise fixed for Basilisk?
See (also):
viewtopic.php?f=61&t=17461#p128000
As far as I know, there are no plans to improve WebExtensions support in Basilisk, because it's primarily intended for development of the XUL platform.

GMforker

Re: ublock question

Unread post by GMforker » 2017-12-01, 13:00

See #216 (#217).

Locked