XUL Support for Future PM

Board for discussions around the Basilisk web browser.

Moderator: satrow

User avatar
LAR Grizzly
Fanatic
Fanatic
Posts: 164
Joined: 2017-08-11, 16:49
Location: Akron, Ohio, USA
Contact:

XUL Support for Future PM

Unread post by LAR Grizzly » 2017-11-22, 03:43

Since Pale Moon will eventually become UXP as stated in Moonchild's Basilisk Release Post, will PM still support XUL or should we switch to Basilisk?
Win7 Pro SP1 64 Bit
Comodo Internet Security
Pale Moon 28.7.1, Interlink Mail 52.9.7176, Firefox 52.9.0esr, Thunderbird 52.9.1 and SeaMonkey 2.48

User avatar
megaman
Moon Magic practitioner
Moon Magic practitioner
Posts: 2874
Joined: 2011-08-30, 16:40
Location: H-town

Re: XUL Support for Future PM

Unread post by megaman » 2017-11-22, 04:21

There was never any plans to remove XUL.

Edit: You can read about it, here.
Curiosity leads to a world of experiments.

User avatar
LAR Grizzly
Fanatic
Fanatic
Posts: 164
Joined: 2017-08-11, 16:49
Location: Akron, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: XUL Support for Future PM

Unread post by LAR Grizzly » 2017-11-22, 04:27

megaman wrote:There was never any plans to remove XUL.

Edit: You can read about it, here.
Thanks. I just officially jumped ship from FX to PM and was wondering if I made a mistake. I'll keep using Pale Moon and see what the future holds. So far, I'm having few troubles with the change over!
Win7 Pro SP1 64 Bit
Comodo Internet Security
Pale Moon 28.7.1, Interlink Mail 52.9.7176, Firefox 52.9.0esr, Thunderbird 52.9.1 and SeaMonkey 2.48

Locked