Board for discussions around the Basilisk web browser.
6 posts • Page 1 of 1
There is a slight difference on the rendered fonts on certain websites. Pale Moon rendered the fonts much sharper. Good news it's still much more readable compared to that blurry monstrosity when I tried Waterfox a few months ago, even after I disabled Hardware Acceleration & Direct2d. I assumed Firefox had the same problem with Waterfox.
Last edited by hujan86 on 2017-11-20, 12:32, edited 1 time in total.
Avatar's Source: yereverluvinuncleber
SierraChart_100 wrote:Firefox started off good and gradually descended into absurdity.
Moonraker wrote:Palemoon is still the only fully customised browser available.
I find that it starts, opens Startpage and is fully useable in about 4 - 5 seconds.hoflaan wrote:....but starts awfully slow (it takes between 15 to 25 seconds with 7 addons and no tabs loading). However it is just the first beta release so we shall see what the near future brings.
Withe PM and Bk open together, RAM useage is about 600MB before opening several tabs and spending some time browsing. Vivaldi and Fx 57 take about 700MB each just on opening!
Windows 7 Pro 32-bit. Comodo Internet security or Comodo Firewall + Avira Anivirus.