First public Basilisk release

Unread post by **Moonchild** » 2017-11-19, 12:07

Terryphi wrote:What about the Linux version?

Moonchild wrote:Updates are automatic in Basilisk.
Check Help -> About

zoli62 · Unread post by **zoli62** » 2017-11-20, 01:17

My question: where is the download link?

Unread post by **satrow** » 2017-11-20, 03:21

Read the Announcement, you'll find the URL to the Basilisk site there: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=17384

Octopuss · Unread post by **Octopuss** » 2017-11-21, 07:29

So what exactly is Brasilisk in relationship with PM? Is the underlaying technology completely different than that PM runs on, or is it just more modern "version", sort of taken from Firefox before the last drastic changes?

Falna · Unread post by **Falna** » 2017-11-21, 13:21

Octopuss wrote:So what exactly is Brasilisk in relationship with PM? Is the underlaying technology completely different than that PM runs on, or is it just more modern "version", sort of taken from Firefox before the last drastic changes?

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=17384
viewtopic.php?f=62&t=17213#p126028

zoli62 · Unread post by **zoli62** » 2017-12-07, 21:51

satrow wrote:Read the Announcement, you'll find the URL to the Basilisk site there: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=17384

Thanks, sorry for late response.

gracious1 · Unread post by **gracious1** » 2017-12-08, 04:59

Octopuss wrote:So what exactly is Brasilisk in relationship with PM?

Please see also this collection of posts that I made here:
Basilisk misperceived as replacement for PM

I gathered up several posts that explain the purpose and plans for Pale Moon, Basilisk, and UXP, and also I hope clear up some misconceptions.

badnick · Unread post by **badnick** » 2017-12-22, 05:55

Basilisk is much slower than PaleMoon.

New Tobin Paradigm · Unread post by **New Tobin Paradigm** » 2017-12-22, 06:09

badnick wrote:Basilisk is much slower than PaleMoon.

Your point? It's development software.. It will get better. Also, on my system it overall is at least as performent as Pale Moon if not noticeably better in some areas. We are really getting very serious about this platform and will next year be really focusing on getting it ready for Pale Moon which means THAT effort will be reflected on Basilisk. This all bodes well for the future!

Do note that Mozilla added about 8 million MORE lines of code vs Tycho and the increased co-oping of e10s and the on-the-fly conditional operating system javascript codepaths instead of it being preprocessed out is going to have an effect. This in time will all be reduced and the js codepaths will once again become targeted for each target OS and less will have to be processed on-the-fly. It can ONLY go up from here and while there are many new challenges.. There are also new opportunities.

I would think by now we have proven ourselves in doing this kind of work as well as responding to deficiencies eventually resolving them.

Unread post by **Moonchild** » 2017-12-22, 10:10

Locking this thread. If there are any specific things you'd like to discuss, kindly make a new topic.

Pale Moon forum

First public Basilisk release

Re: First public Basilisk release

Re: First public Basilisk release

Re: First public Basilisk release

Re: First public Basilisk release

Re: First public Basilisk release

Re: First public Basilisk release

Re: First public Basilisk release

Re: First public Basilisk release

Re: First public Basilisk release

Re: First public Basilisk release