Basilik & Australis Topic is solved

[KNTRO]

Hi,

I'd like to ask about the decision of using Australis in Basilik. If most people —as I think it's the case— is happy by using a non Australis interface with Pale Moon, will Basilik use Australis anyway?

I was thinking that Basilik would be a really interesting web browser if it'd have:

• Firefox 52-56 features/functions
• Firefox 4-28 interface (pre Australis), just like Pale Moon

Sorry if this topic has been already discussed —I made a search and found nothing at the forum.

Bas'k regards.

[Moonchild]

It's already been discussed. There are no plans to give Basilisk a non-Australis interface.

[roytam1]

It's already been discussed. There are no plans to give Basilisk a non-Australis interface.

BTW can Pale Moon (UI, etc.) run on UXP(which Basilik runs on)?

[adesh]

That's supposedly Pale Moon's future (I remember from one of MC's post on the topic), so there must be plans for that.

[New Tobin Paradigm]

That's supposedly Pale Moon's future (I remember from one of MC's post on the topic), so there must be plans for that.

Don't worry about Pale Moon on UXP .. It will still be Pale Moon JUST AS Pale Moon on "Tycho" was still Pale Moon for version 27.*

[gracious1]

I was thinking that Basilik would be a really interesting web browser if it'd have:

• Firefox 52-56 features/functions
• Firefox 4-28 interface (pre Australis), just like Pale Moon

Hi, KNTRO!
Perhaps you could install Classic Theme Restorer ?

EDIT: Never mind, Basilisk disabled it right after I installed it.

I just want to add that so far I have had zero luck installing any extensions.
(I have successfully installed personas, however.)

[ron_1]

Classic Theme Restorer works for me on Basilisk.

Off-topic:
However, I'm getting a message for both Status-4-Evar and Decentraleyes that it "is known to cause security and stability issues." But both seem to be working, so I don't know what's up with the messages.