inet_ntoa vs. inet_ntop ?

Talk about code development, features, specific bugs, enhancements, patches, and similar things.
Forum rules
Please keep everything here strictly on-topic.
This board is meant for Pale Moon source code development related subjects only like code snippets, patches, specific bugs, git, the repositories, etc.

This is not for tech support! Please do not post tech support questions in the "Development" board!
Please make sure not to use this board for support questions. Please post issues with specific websites, extensions, etc. in the relevant boards for those topics.

Please keep things on-topic as this forum will be used for reference for Pale Moon development. Expect topics that aren't relevant as such to be moved or deleted.
jb_wisemo
Moonbather
Moonbather
Posts: 56
Joined: 2016-01-27, 02:09

inet_ntoa vs. inet_ntop ?

Unread post by jb_wisemo » 2023-05-16, 15:56

According the the Linux inet_ntop man page "inet_ntoa(3) is now considered to be deprecated in favor of inet_ntop()", however the v32.2.0 Palemoon release notes state the opposite. Is this simply a typo, or did someone actually deprecate in the opposite direction?

vannilla
Moon Magic practitioner
Moon Magic practitioner
Posts: 2183
Joined: 2018-05-05, 13:29

Re: inet_ntoa vs. inet_ntop ?

Unread post by vannilla » 2023-05-16, 16:09


User avatar
Moonchild
Pale Moon guru
Pale Moon guru
Posts: 35473
Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
Location: Motala, SE
Contact:

Re: inet_ntoa vs. inet_ntop ?

Unread post by Moonchild » 2023-05-16, 16:45

oops. let me fix that...

aand... done.

Thanks for pointing out the typo!
"Sometimes, the best way to get what you want is to be a good person." -- Louis Rossmann
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite

Locked