thought i would help
this is code difference between firefox and palemoon
hope helps people understand the difference on code level the hard work our MC does
had problem uploading the zip to forums took long time to do
Code difference Firefox|Palemoon
Forum rules
Please keep everything here strictly on-topic.
This board is meant for Pale Moon source code development related subjects only like code snippets, patches, specific bugs, git, the repositories, etc.
This is not for tech support! Please do not post tech support questions in the "Development" board!
Please make sure not to use this board for support questions. Please post issues with specific websites, extensions, etc. in the relevant boards for those topics.
Please keep things on-topic as this forum will be used for reference for Pale Moon development. Expect topics that aren't relevant as such to be moved or deleted.
Please keep everything here strictly on-topic.
This board is meant for Pale Moon source code development related subjects only like code snippets, patches, specific bugs, git, the repositories, etc.
This is not for tech support! Please do not post tech support questions in the "Development" board!
Please make sure not to use this board for support questions. Please post issues with specific websites, extensions, etc. in the relevant boards for those topics.
Please keep things on-topic as this forum will be used for reference for Pale Moon development. Expect topics that aren't relevant as such to be moved or deleted.
Code difference Firefox|Palemoon
Last edited by Tweakzy on 2013-07-13, 11:21, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Code difference Firefox|Palemoon
I ran a Diff on it my self. However, I am not sure if Moonchild wants this published change for change. Of course being open source the source is available to everyone to run their one diff on. But while he will im sure appeciate the effort. I am not so sure of his responce to a change by change.
-
- Pale Moon guru
- Posts: 35650
- Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
- Location: Motala, SE
Re: Code difference Firefox|Palemoon
It's Open Source. Publishing parts of the source tree is not a problem, but do keep in mind that the graphics files carrying the Pale Moon logo as part of the source are protected by copyright and you have to comply with the MPL source publication requirement, meaning include a LICENSE file or similar outlining the terms under which the partial source files are distributed (also including a statement that it does not include the right to use the Pale Moon name or logo).
If you want to publish, make sure you satisfy all requirements for distribution of the source and any part thereof. Open Source does not equal Public Domain. People have to realize that. Since you don't satisfy those requirements in your zip, please take them down. Feel free to re-publish once you comply with the licensing terms for the source
Sorry to be an ass about it, if that's what you think, but those are the rules laid down for the source code.
If you want to publish, make sure you satisfy all requirements for distribution of the source and any part thereof. Open Source does not equal Public Domain. People have to realize that. Since you don't satisfy those requirements in your zip, please take them down. Feel free to re-publish once you comply with the licensing terms for the source
Sorry to be an ass about it, if that's what you think, but those are the rules laid down for the source code.
"Sometimes, the best way to get what you want is to be a good person." -- Louis Rossmann
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
Re: Code difference Firefox|Palemoon
soz did not know it if ok will reup with them changeMoonchild wrote:It's Open Source. Publishing parts of the source tree is not a problem, but do keep in mind that the graphics files carrying the Pale Moon logo as part of the source are protected by copyright and you have to comply with the MPL source publication requirement, meaning include a LICENSE file or similar outlining the terms under which the partial source files are distributed (also including a statement that it does not include the right to use the Pale Moon name or logo).
If you want to publish, make sure you satisfy all requirements for distribution of the source and any part thereof. Open Source does not equal Public Domain. People have to realize that. Since you don't satisfy those requirements in your zip, please take them down. Feel free to re-publish once you comply with the licensing terms for the source
Sorry to be an ass about it, if that's what you think, but those are the rules laid down for the source code.