Why do you use the unstable builds of Pale Moon?

Talk about code development, features, specific bugzilla bugs, enhancements, patches, and other highly technical things.
Forum rules
Please keep everything here strictly on-topic.
This board is meant for Pale Moon source code development related subjects only like code snippets, patches, specific referenced Bugzilla bugs, mercurial, etc.

This is not for tech support! Please do not post tech support questions in the "Development" board!
Please make sure not to use this board for support questions. Most "bug reports" do not belong in this board and should initially be posted in Community Support or other relevant support boards.

Please keep things on-topic as this forum will be used for reference for Pale Moon development. Expect topics that aren't relevant as such to be moved or deleted.
Post Reply

Why do you use the unstable builds?

Poll ended at 2020-04-08, 17:10

To get early access to the latest and greatest changes
4
18%
To help development of my favorite browser by testing and reporting bugs
4
18%
Because I want to (read: I'm a moron)
3
14%
I don't
11
50%
 
Total votes: 22

User avatar
New Tobin Paradigm
Off-Topic Sheriff
Off-Topic Sheriff
Posts: 7339
Joined: 2012-10-09, 19:37
Location: Binary Outcast

Why do you use the unstable builds of Pale Moon?

Post by New Tobin Paradigm » 2020-03-25, 17:10

Since there seems to be some confusion about the unstable builds and a general lack of catching several bugs that made it to release.. I want to know why you use the unstable version.

User avatar
therube
Board Warrior
Board Warrior
Posts: 1298
Joined: 2018-06-08, 17:02

Re: Why do you use the unstable builds of Pale Moon?

Post by therube » 2020-03-25, 18:23

(browsers in general, not specific to PM...)

For me, usability & stability are of prime importance.
These days, I do not find any browser that meets those (what should be minimal) criteria.

That said, I use what I'm comfortable with.
Then I dabble with browsers that may do certain things better then what my comfortable browser does.


(on the FF end, more specifically...)

I treat FF as a trash browser.
Don't care what I do to it, don't care what I throw at it.
If it works, it works, if it breaks, it breaks. I don't worry myself about it.

I no longer consider FF to do anything in the users interest.
I no longer expect FF to act (UI/UX) in a reasonable manner.
I no longer expect Mozilla to fix "usability" bugs.
I do not expect FF to be stable.

Given times, & FF update cycle, just about every time you turn around, a new version is out, & with that something breaks...

So to me, at this point with them, whether you are on Release or Nightly, there really isn't a whole lot of difference.

That said, at some point in time, Nightly got a fix (finally) to a bug that was really bugging me.
So at that point, I jumped to Nightly, & have just remained there (considering I don't consider FF to be particularly usable or stable, & I treat it as a trash browser).

So my reason, for (FF) unstable (Nightly) was because of a fix that came through there (now since in Release) & there just isn't any particular reason to drop back to Release.

So, every so often, I'll hit a bug, or some "feature" that bugs me to no end, & file a Bug report.
I don't particularly expect any action to be taken on any Bug report, but still do (report, sometimes).


(Never used PM unstable. Maybe I should?)


(I think I went overboard, & not exactly what you're looking for. But as no one else... ;-).
Guess I just should have said, oh, I try to help out by keeping an eye open for things that are wrong so that they can get fixed in a timely manner - before turning up in a release :-).)

Post Reply