Possible Permissions Enhancement

Talk about code development, features, specific bugzilla bugs, enhancements, patches, and other highly technical things.

Moderator: satrow

Forum rules
Please keep everything here strictly on-topic.
This board is meant for Pale Moon source code development related subjects only like code snippets, patches, specific referenced Bugzilla bugs, mercurial, etc.

This is not for tech support! Please do not post tech support questions in the "Development" board!
Please make sure not to use this board for support questions. Most "bug reports" do not belong in this board and should initially be posted in Community Support or other relevant support boards.

Please keep things on-topic as this forum will be used for reference for Pale Moon development. Expect topics that aren't relevant as such to be moved or deleted.
User avatar
[TMac]
Hobby Astronomer
Hobby Astronomer
Posts: 15
Joined: 2019-06-29, 21:18

Possible Permissions Enhancement

Unread post by [TMac] » 2019-07-17, 03:12

There's an area I'd like a bit more powerful, which I'm happy to code up, if it won't get rejected... I don't dig the approach to per-site User Agent settings.

I'd like to add to the Permissions screen a (per-site, obviously) User Agent setting.

I asked M.C. He said I should query here.

It's not a 'permission' but is site-specific. Thoughts?

User avatar
New Tobin Paradigm
Off-Topic Sheriff
Off-Topic Sheriff
Posts: 5890
Joined: 2012-10-09, 19:37
Location: Sector 001

Re: Possible Permissions Enhancement

Unread post by New Tobin Paradigm » 2019-07-17, 04:47

Extensionsphere. Prove your concept there first.

User avatar
RoestVrijStaal
Hobby Astronomer
Hobby Astronomer
Posts: 18
Joined: 2019-06-19, 19:18
Location: Dependency Hell

Re: Possible Permissions Enhancement

Unread post by RoestVrijStaal » 2019-07-23, 16:37

You mean a permission-rule to "peg" a specific user agent on a website, inclusive the used crossdomain (sub)domains?

As an avid user of Pale Moon who has plenty of useragent overrides of websites coded by "There is only Chrome"-coders, I'd welcome this feature :D

Post Reply