Reconsidering Gemini and alike

Add-ons for Pale Moon and other applications
General discussion, compatibility, contributed extensions, themes, plugins, and more.

Moderators: FranklinDM, Lootyhoof

User avatar
Schimon
Apollo supporter
Apollo supporter
Posts: 41
Joined: 2024-12-09, 14:01

Reconsidering Gemini and alike

Post by Schimon » 2025-04-11, 07:34

This thread is related to thread viewtopic.php?f=5&t=26278

Greetings!

I suggest to support Finger, Gemini, Gopher, NEX, Spartan, Text etc.

http://portal.mozz.us

Gopher used to be supported in Netscape until people of the "red lizard" have removed it.

I am writing an article about the people of the red lizard who try to influence the perception of people to believe that there is no othre protocol other than the broken HTTP protocol.

Censorship

gemini://woodpeckersnest.space/~schapps/journal/2024-05-28-censoring-gemini-and-gopher.gmi

gemini://woodpeckersnest.space/~schapps/journal/2024-08-03-the-protocol-ed2k-is-being-subtly-censored.gmi (a selective censorship)

HTML and HTTP

gemini://woodpeckersnest.space/~schapps/journal/2024-06-08-the-assault-for-html-and-http.gmi

gemini://woodpeckersnest.space/~schapps/journal/2024-06-10-the-capmpaign-for-html5-was-a-war-against-xml-and-interoperability.gmi (Basilisk and Pale Moon are mentioned for good) (incomplete)

XML

gemini://woodpeckersnest.space/~schapps/journal/2024-06-11-xml-is-the-most-purposful-language.gmi

gemini://woodpeckersnest.space/~schapps/journal/2024-12-04-publishing-sites-with-pure-xml-instead-of-html-and-xhtml.gmi

Notice, that due to the removal of XUL from version 57, ChatZilla could not be useful, which meant that the removal of XUL was also designed to prevent the interaction with other protocols, such as FTP, Gemini, Gopher, IMAP, IRC, MQTT, XMPP etc.

Basilisk and Pale Moon utilize UXP which allows me to develop software that integrate with XMPP. viewtopic.php?f=5&t=31900

Did you know that some browsers have removed support for FTP, to further try to perpetuate HTTP?

User avatar
jobbautista9
Board Warrior
Board Warrior
Posts: 1138
Joined: 2020-11-03, 06:47
Location: Philippines

Re: Reconsidering Gemini and alike

Post by jobbautista9 » 2025-04-11, 08:44

OverbiteFF already implements Gopher. But updating that browser extension is welcome
Image

Tired of creating stuff!

Avatar artwork by Shinki669: https://www.pixiv.net/artworks/113645617

XUL add-ons developer. You can find a list of add-ons I manage at http://rw.rs/~job/software.html.

User avatar
Moonchild
Project founder
Project founder
Posts: 38833
Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
Location: Sweden

Re: Reconsidering Gemini and alike

Post by Moonchild » 2025-04-11, 09:32

Schimon wrote:
2025-04-11, 07:34
Notice, that due to the removal of XUL from version 57, ChatZilla could not be useful, which meant that the removal of XUL was also designed to prevent the interaction with other protocols, such as FTP, Gemini, Gopher, IMAP, IRC, MQTT, XMPP etc.
And how is that supposed to be relevant here, in this community? ...that focuses on and builds around a XUL-based browser?
jobbautista9 wrote:
2025-04-11, 08:44
OverbiteFF already implements Gopher. But updating that browser extension is welcome
I'm quite sure that it can be adapted to support other content formats and protocols for getting content. At the very least it can be used as a guideline to build your own special-purpose extensions. None of this belongs in the browser core, IMO.
I'll be moving this to the add-ons board.
"There is no point in arguing with an idiot, because then you're both idiots." - Anonymous
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite

User avatar
Schimon
Apollo supporter
Apollo supporter
Posts: 41
Joined: 2024-12-09, 14:01

Re: Reconsidering Gemini and alike

Post by Schimon » 2025-04-11, 13:06

jobbautista9 wrote:
2025-04-11, 08:44
OverbiteFF already implements Gopher. But updating that browser extension is welcome
Thank you. It is good to know.
Moonchild wrote:
2025-04-11, 09:32
Schimon wrote:
2025-04-11, 07:34
Notice, that due to the removal of XUL from version 57, ChatZilla could not be useful, which meant that the removal of XUL was also designed to prevent the interaction with other protocols, such as FTP, Gemini, Gopher, IMAP, IRC, MQTT, XMPP etc.
And how is that supposed to be relevant here, in this community? ...that focuses on and builds around a XUL-based browser?
For extending the possibilities of Pale Moon and improving the browsing experience, especially with syndicated data such as Gemini feed and XMPP.
Moonchild wrote:
2025-04-11, 09:32
jobbautista9 wrote:
2025-04-11, 08:44
OverbiteFF already implements Gopher. But updating that browser extension is welcome
I'm quite sure that it can be adapted to support other content formats and protocols for getting content. At the very least it can be used as a guideline to build your own special-purpose extensions. None of this belongs in the browser core, IMO.
I'll be moving this to the add-ons board.
Thank you for the idea!