Compatibility Reports for v25 (Archive)

Anything to do with the Pale Moon add-ons website. (addons.palemoon.org)
Not for questions about add-ons themselves!
Forum rules
Important: This board is for specifics regarding the add-ons website (addons.palemoon.org) and not to report extension compatibility issues or discuss different extensions.
Please only post here when your topic is directly related to the add-ons website service so our moderators don't have to move your posts all the time...
WackyModder84

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by WackyModder84 » 2014-10-16, 22:33

Ok so after checking Pale Moon 25.0.1, apparently Self-Destructing Cookies, Speed DNS and IE Tab 2 are now working properly.

Thought it's best to report that so that people will know that they're fixed now. :thumbup:

Herman Strange

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by Herman Strange » 2014-10-17, 02:42

Herman Strange wrote:Name: Shorten URL (Bit.ly) 0.94
Type: Extension
Issue: Non-functional*
Cause: Pale Moon v25
Workaround: Revert to previous version of Pale Moon.
AMO: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/shorten-url-bitly/

* Extension provides functionality to create and optionally share short URL for page, link, or element from right-click context menu. After upgrade to Pale Moon 25 menu options do not appear and ability to authorize extension to bit.ly account key is nonfunctional.
UPDATE: Appears to be fully functional in 25.0.1

New Tobin Paradigm

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by New Tobin Paradigm » 2014-10-17, 03:51

Will Pittenger wrote:This report seems to have vanished.
Matt A Tobin wrote: Also, please keep any discussion to an ABSOLUTE MINIMUM! I cannot stress this enough...

Please phrase your report in the following format

access2godzilla

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by access2godzilla » 2014-10-17, 04:09

Matt A Tobin wrote:the "-ish" addons are gonna HAVE to be [dealt] with by the developer or if someone wants to step up here and deal with them.. It isn't as simple as others..
The stylish author has added support for Pale Moon :D

I haven't got a response from the Scriptish author though... but GUID substitution across all the files containing the FF GUID does work.

ckit_x64

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by ckit_x64 » 2014-10-17, 11:30

access2godzilla wrote:
Matt A Tobin wrote:the "-ish" addons are gonna HAVE to be [dealt] with by the developer or if someone wants to step up here and deal with them.. It isn't as simple as others..
The stylish author has added support for Pale Moon :D
Wonderful but Stylish 1.5.0a1 still has a double entry in the Add-ons manager.

win7-7
Fanatic
Fanatic
Posts: 183
Joined: 2013-09-16, 15:18
Location: --

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by win7-7 » 2014-10-17, 11:53

ckit_x64 wrote:
access2godzilla wrote:
Matt A Tobin wrote:the "-ish" addons are gonna HAVE to be [dealt] with by the developer or if someone wants to step up here and deal with them.. It isn't as simple as others..
The stylish author has added support for Pale Moon :D
Wonderful but Stylish 1.5.0a1 still has a double entry in the Add-ons manager.
I have started using Stylish 1.5.0a1 and it doesn't have double entry problem. Are you sure that your profile isn't corrupted or that you are not using any conflicting add-ons? Corrupted profile can cause all kind of strange problems.

User avatar
hitokage
Fanatic
Fanatic
Posts: 105
Joined: 2014-05-03, 02:19
Location: Frederick, MD

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by hitokage » 2014-10-17, 12:30

Name: Personas Rotator
Type: Extension
Issue: The save function in the option menu doesn't work (the other option menu in the add-ons manager does work). Rotate next from the Personas Plus menu doesn't work, but if you use the toolbar icon it thinks Personas Plus isn't installed (due to the different extension ID probably). Auto-rotation also seems to not work.
Cause: unknown/multiple
Workaround: none that are give the same automatically functionality
AMO: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/personas-rotator/

ckit_x64

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by ckit_x64 » 2014-10-17, 13:02

win7-7 wrote:I have started using Stylish 1.5.0a1 and it doesn't have double entry problem. Are you sure that your profile isn't corrupted or that you are not using any conflicting add-ons? Corrupted profile can cause all kind of strange problems.
Nope, just created another profile (called it Test.. LOL) and added just the new Stylish 1.5.0a1 extension and still got double entry.
At a guess, this is a 32-bit extension not working very well on a 64-bit browser.

New Tobin Paradigm

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by New Tobin Paradigm » 2014-10-17, 13:05

Well that was pointless of the author.. If he isn't going to fix all the issues then this leaves Stylish in the exact same condition it was before as we allow all Firefox add-ons to pass the install check. Let us hope he will actually correct the issue then now that he has added support in install.rdf.

win7-7
Fanatic
Fanatic
Posts: 183
Joined: 2013-09-16, 15:18
Location: --

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by win7-7 » 2014-10-17, 13:21

ckit_x64 wrote:
win7-7 wrote:I have started using Stylish 1.5.0a1 and it doesn't have double entry problem. Are you sure that your profile isn't corrupted or that you are not using any conflicting add-ons? Corrupted profile can cause all kind of strange problems.
Nope, just created another profile (called it Test.. LOL) and added just the new Stylish 1.5.0a1 extension and still got double entry.
At a guess, this is a 32-bit extension not working very well on a 64-bit browser.
I don't think that is problem. I have no problem with version 1.5.0a1 in either AVX x64 or regular x64 Pale Moon. Also are you using some language pack?

Could you try following .xpi file and tell if it works.

(Please do not upload XPI files to the forum if you want to extange them use PM so that users don't blindly download unapproved and unauthorized edits -Tobin)

Freezing Moon

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by Freezing Moon » 2014-10-17, 14:19

Where I can find this beta version of Stylish ?

ckit_x64

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by ckit_x64 » 2014-10-17, 14:29

Tobin,
Win7-7 and myself both have working Stylish 1.5.0a1 XPI's now, appears to be working 100% but I'll need a day or two just to be safe.

The double entry issue is gone with the XPI, Win7-7 provided me, the one I created was a Fail.

Lao Pan

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by Lao Pan » 2014-10-17, 14:43

Self_Destructing_Cookies-0.4.6 Will not reinstall without modifying Install.rdf - Changed Firefox to Pale Moon, Changed GUID and changed min version from 26 to 24 - Now installs and works as expected.

Noticed that the 0.4.7 beta is an Australis Native Widget - perhaps this makes 0.4.6 a candidate for Pseudo Static

New Tobin Paradigm

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by New Tobin Paradigm » 2014-10-17, 15:10

Lao Pan wrote:Self_Destructing_Cookies-0.4.6 Will not reinstall without modifying Install.rdf - Changed Firefox to Pale Moon, Changed GUID and changed min version from 26 to 24 - Now installs and works as expected.

Noticed that the 0.4.7 beta is an Australis Native Widget - perhaps this makes 0.4.6 a candidate for Pseudo Static
if that is the csse i agree will get on that

Mart Ini

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by Mart Ini » 2014-10-17, 16:36

Name: Ghostery
Type: addon
Issue: no longer compatible
Cause: It doenst work with palemoon 25.0.1
Workaround: i tried to eddit the xpi and change the version in the install .rdf file.When i do that the file is corrupt
AMO:

New Tobin Paradigm

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by New Tobin Paradigm » 2014-10-17, 16:55

EDIT: Thread now unlocked known incompat page updated, Thanks for waiting!

May I remind you to check the known incompatibilities page AND the previous posts in this thread BEFORE posting. Do not post XPI files and DO NOT go beyond the scope of reporting add-ons that are broken. Future posts that do not adhere to these guidelines are not helpful will be deleted without discussion. (if you want focus on your add-ons to be resolved stop distracting us by having us have to respond and deal with posts that are not in-line with this thread.

For more detail See: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=6124

Mark_Lee

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by Mark_Lee » 2014-10-17, 18:19

Name: FireFTP
Type: Addon
Issue: Not available for Firefox 24.9
Cause: unknown
Workaround: None known
AMO: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo ... src=search

I apologize if this is a repeat. My initial posting appears to have been lost.
- Mark Lee

New Tobin Paradigm

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by New Tobin Paradigm » 2014-10-17, 18:29

Mark_Lee wrote:Name: FireFTP
Type: Addon
Issue: Not available for Firefox 24.9
Cause: unknown
Workaround: None known
AMO: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo ... src=search

I apologize if this is a repeat. My initial posting appears to have been lost.
- Mark Lee
They are targeting only the most recent versions of firefox and Firefox 24.9 is only what Pale Moon reports to AMO as its compatibility for installation. I have put in a request to them because this add-on is too complex to psudeo-staticize without going back to an older version. if there is no response I will psuedo-static the last compat version.

Mark_Lee

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by Mark_Lee » 2014-10-17, 20:08

Mr. Tobin;
Thank you. That is most appreciated.

Mark Lee

Quantum Reality

Re: Compatibility Reports for v25

Post by Quantum Reality » 2014-10-18, 05:08

Name: Self-Destructing Cookies 0.4.6
Type: Extension
Issue: Does NOT install in PM 25.0.1 (Win7 x64)
Cause: Apparent version number mismatch, also GUID mismatch
Workaround: Install SDC 0.4.4, but does not upgrade to 0.4.6 within PM 25.0.1
AMO: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo ... g-cookies/

This is because there have been conflicting reports about whether or not SDC will work with 35.0.1 with some people being able to install it, others not. In my case I am stuck with an older version until either the SDC developer fixes the issue or Pale Moon provides a way for the add-on to get upgraded.