
Add-ons Site General Discussion
Forum rules
Important: This board is for specifics regarding the add-ons website (addons.palemoon.org) and not to report extension compatibility issues or discuss different extensions.
Please only post here when your topic is directly related to the add-ons website service so our moderators don't have to move your posts all the time...
Important: This board is for specifics regarding the add-ons website (addons.palemoon.org) and not to report extension compatibility issues or discuss different extensions.
Please only post here when your topic is directly related to the add-ons website service so our moderators don't have to move your posts all the time...
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
Video DownloadHelper does not know of Pale Moon however, it does Just Work(tm) 

Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
Download Status Bar supports Pale Moon.
Kudos for the developer!
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo ... ar/?src=ssSupports Pale Moon
Kudos for the developer!
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
Haha, yepMatt A Tobin wrote:Video DownloadHelper does not know of Pale Moon however, it does Just Work(tm)

And curious, I read an announcement regarding some server maintenance and updates to the addons website. When shall these take place?
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
On going actually.11ryanc wrote:Haha, yepMatt A Tobin wrote:Video DownloadHelper does not know of Pale Moon however, it does Just Work(tm)Little skeptical about updates though, never know when they could change something and break compatibility. Unlikely, but not impossible by any means. In the worse case scenario we could just turn to a static approach, use the last working version. As of today that is v. 4.9.24.
And curious, I read an announcement regarding some server maintenance and updates to the addons website. When shall these take place?
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
I see. If you could clarify though please; just how does one have an extension or theme authored on the PM addons library if he/she desires? To whom would they contact?Matt A Tobin wrote:On going actually.11ryanc wrote:Haha, yepMatt A Tobin wrote:Video DownloadHelper does not know of Pale Moon however, it does Just Work(tm)Little skeptical about updates though, never know when they could change something and break compatibility. Unlikely, but not impossible by any means. In the worse case scenario we could just turn to a static approach, use the last working version. As of today that is v. 4.9.24.
And curious, I read an announcement regarding some server maintenance and updates to the addons website. When shall these take place?
Not that I'm in any position to develop an addon at this time, just hypothetically speaking is all.
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
Clarification will come with the enhancements of the site all spelled out and everything.
However, in general you will still have to deal with me.. I am hoping perhaps to get a webform up that will allow you to upload an add-on so it can be placed in the queue..
However, in general you will still have to deal with me.. I am hoping perhaps to get a webform up that will allow you to upload an add-on so it can be placed in the queue..
-
- Moon Magic practitioner
- Posts: 2801
- Joined: 2012-08-19, 20:32
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
The improved "Known Incompatible..." page is quite nice, well done. I think you should sort the lists alphabetically, the current random state is a bit confusing to the eye (and annoying for a quick look/search).
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
I thought that at first too, then remembered that I could use Ctrl-F.back2themoon wrote:The improved "Known Incompatible..." page is quite nice, well done. I think you should sort the lists alphabetically, the current random state is a bit confusing to the eye (and annoying for a quick look/search).
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
Well here is a proper question. Since the list is manually maintained and stuff is moved from one list to another.. Do you want me to spend time making sure things are in alphabetical order / finding or creating a solution to automagically sort them.. or time making sure things are actually happening like updating the site, contacting developers, forking, pseudo-static'ing, adding externals, getting dev docs up, working on the update checking script to enable PM specific add-ons as well as AMO add-ons can be updated?x-15a2 wrote:I thought that at first too, then remembered that I could use Ctrl-F.back2themoon wrote:The improved "Known Incompatible..." page is quite nice, well done. I think you should sort the lists alphabetically, the current random state is a bit confusing to the eye (and annoying for a quick look/search).
Your choice

-
- Moon Magic practitioner
- Posts: 2801
- Joined: 2012-08-19, 20:32
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
Knew that from the start, but it's irrelevant. Unsorted lists usually make a bad impression to the eye (and consequently, the website will leave such an impression). But even functionality-wise, why force the use of a manual search when a quick look would be enough?x-15a2 wrote:I thought that at first too, then remembered that I could use Ctrl-F.back2themoon wrote:The improved "Known Incompatible..." page is quite nice, well done. I think you should sort the lists alphabetically, the current random state is a bit confusing to the eye (and annoying for a quick look/search).
Well honestly I imagined (wrongly, it seems) it could be handled easily and automatically (in an Excel kind of fashion), that's why I mentioned it. If these are the only two choices, there's no contest.Matt A Tobin wrote:Well here is a proper question. Since the list is manually maintained and stuff is moved from one list to another.. Do you want me to spend time making sure things are in alphabetical order / finding or creating a solution to automagically sort them.. or time making sure things are actually happening like updating the site, contacting developers, forking, pseudo-static'ing, adding externals, getting dev docs up, working on the update checking script to enable PM specific add-ons as well as AMO add-ons can be updated? Your choice
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
In the long run it won't matter the GOAL is to reduce the page down to one SMALL simple list and eliminate entries.back2themoon wrote: Well honestly I imagined (wrongly, it seems) it could be handled easily and automatically (in an Excel kind of fashion), that's why I mentioned it. If these are the only two choices, there's no contest.
Also.. something more automated will likely make it into the next generation site software with a rational database.. just right now it is rather manual. The main thing it is way better than it used to be.. Always improving twords a goal.. THAT is what matters!
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
The list could have been sorted in the time it took to type your post. Once it's sorted, it wouldn't have to be sorted again.Matt A Tobin wrote:Well here is a proper question. Since the list is manually maintained and stuff is moved from one list to another.. Do you want me to spend time making sure things are in alphabetical order / finding or creating a solution to automagically sort them.. or time making sure things are actually happening like updating the site, contacting developers, forking, pseudo-static'ing, adding externals, getting dev docs up, working on the update checking script to enable PM specific add-ons as well as AMO add-ons can be updated?x-15a2 wrote:I thought that at first too, then remembered that I could use Ctrl-F.back2themoon wrote:The improved "Known Incompatible..." page is quite nice, well done. I think you should sort the lists alphabetically, the current random state is a bit confusing to the eye (and annoying for a quick look/search).
Your choice
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
That assumes the list is never changing. That also assumes I am not using HTML. That additionally assumes it is one list. Use CTRL+F.. I will deal with it when I am not busy with everything else.Brian wrote:The list could have been sorted in the time it took to type your post. Once it's sorted, it wouldn't have to be sorted again.
You know.. It surprises me how much people complain about trivial things. You know I don't get paid to do this stuff right? In fact I am PAYING OUT money to provide this service to a project I believe strongly in to help fellow users. I don't HAVE to be doing it. I also could have left the page as it was or not even HAVE that page let alone the add-ons site at all.
The fact is I spent significant time to revise that page to be easier to read and show progress on reported add-ons when the previous list did the job. I did sort it.. Into categories. The current order happens to be largely the order stuff was reported but it is clearly stated that it is in no particular order. But yes I will revise it when the more critical areas are resolved even though it will make it slightly more difficult to relate that page with the compat thread (archive).
-
- Moon Magic practitioner
- Posts: 2801
- Joined: 2012-08-19, 20:32
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
Wasn't complaining, I thought you might have forgot to sort since I understand how busy you are. Just a minor suggestion/reminder, nothing more. Keep up the great work.
-
- Pale Moon guru
- Posts: 37350
- Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
- Location: Motala, SE
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
You weren't, but Brian was.back2themoon wrote:Wasn't complaining...
"The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything." - Albert Einstein
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
Wrong. I posted no complaints whatsoever.Moonchild wrote:You weren't, but Brian was.back2themoon wrote:Wasn't complaining...
The only posts here that could be considered complaints were back2themoon's and Matt's.
the current random state is a bit confusing to the eye (and annoying for a quick look/search)
-
- Add-ons Team
- Posts: 695
- Joined: 2014-05-25, 11:18
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
Here goes:The improved "Known Incompatible..." page is quite nice, well done. I think you should sort the lists alphabetically, the current random state is a bit confusing to the eye (and annoying for a quick look/search).
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Antonius32 on 2014-12-21, 19:53, edited 12 times in total.
-
- Add-ons Team
- Posts: 695
- Joined: 2014-05-25, 11:18
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
I think I better leave that to an expert..Matt A Tobin wrote:Convert it to html...


Re: Add-ons Site General Discussion
Done. Thanks for Notepad++ for a fast convertionMatt A Tobin wrote:Convert it to html...

(the forum don't let me upload a .html.txt or a .txt with the html code

Sourcecode: http://pastebin.com/FeKbrctV
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.