Preservation effort for current XUL Thunderbird extensions?

General discussion and chat (archived)

Moderator: satrow

User avatar
mr tribute
Fanatic
Fanatic
Posts: 129
Joined: 2016-03-19, 23:24

Preservation effort for current XUL Thunderbird extensions?

Unread post by mr tribute » 2019-05-08, 17:52

I assume there will "always" be a mail client based on UXP. Thunderbird 68 slated for release sometime later this year seems to come with less add-on compatibility. Is there an effort to save TB extensions similar to what has been done with Firefox extensions?

I realize those TB extensions might need work before being compatible with for example Interlink. Anyway, it would be a shame to lose them because modifying an extension is probably a whole lot easier than starting from scratch for a potential add-on developer.

It's sad to see Thunderbird going the same way as Firefox although they try to keep some add-on compatibility (less and less).

https://addons.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/

PS If some of those extensions are WebExtensions, please excuse me.

User avatar
New Tobin Paradigm
Off-Topic Sheriff
Off-Topic Sheriff
Posts: 5889
Joined: 2012-10-09, 19:37
Location: Sector 001

Re: Preservation effort for current XUL Thunderbird extensions?

Unread post by New Tobin Paradigm » 2019-05-08, 18:33

Port them to Interlink.

User avatar
Isengrim
Keeps coming back
Keeps coming back
Posts: 970
Joined: 2015-09-08, 22:54
Location: 127.0.0.1
Contact:

Re: Preservation effort for current XUL Thunderbird extensions?

Unread post by Isengrim » 2019-05-08, 21:29

New Tobin Paradigm wrote:
2019-05-08, 18:33
Port them to Interlink.
This is a long-term goal. Short term, I think it would be beneficial to archive as many as possible so that we can continue work on porting them or referencing them even if they are wiped from the TB add-ons site.
Linux Mint 19.2 Cinnamon (64-bit), Windows 7 (64-bit), Windows 10 build 1803 (64-bit)
"As long as there is someone who will appreciate the work involved in the creation, the effort is time well spent." ~ Tetsuzou Kamadani, Cave Story

User avatar
New Tobin Paradigm
Off-Topic Sheriff
Off-Topic Sheriff
Posts: 5889
Joined: 2012-10-09, 19:37
Location: Sector 001

Re: Preservation effort for current XUL Thunderbird extensions?

Unread post by New Tobin Paradigm » 2019-05-08, 21:43

Think JustOff could be persuaded to do this in a minor fork of CAA or expand CAA to TB/SM?

User avatar
back2themoon
Board Warrior
Board Warrior
Posts: 1455
Joined: 2012-08-19, 20:32

Re: Preservation effort for current XUL Thunderbird extensions?

Unread post by back2themoon » 2019-05-08, 22:17

It seems that even the dictionaries might disappear. These could be even harder to locate later - I've already backed up the ones I need.

edit: perhaps though they'd be easier to fork/extract/convert? Don't know.
Safe Mode / clean profile info: Help/Restart in Safe Mode
Information to include when asking for support - How to apply user agent overrides
How to download videos

Windows 10 Pro • Pale Moon x64 • Interlink x86 • Emsisoft Anti-Malware

User avatar
New Tobin Paradigm
Off-Topic Sheriff
Off-Topic Sheriff
Posts: 5889
Joined: 2012-10-09, 19:37
Location: Sector 001

Re: Preservation effort for current XUL Thunderbird extensions?

Unread post by New Tobin Paradigm » 2019-05-08, 23:16

We have forked all the dictionaries.. Also, they are generic to any application. I just haven't put them on the Add-ons Site yet. So that is irrelevant to this thread.

Requires adding support for the add-on type, writing an import system to initially get them into the database, and deciding what to do about updating them.. Expect this in Phoebus 2.1.

User avatar
JustOff
Localization Coordinator
Localization Coordinator
Posts: 1780
Joined: 2015-09-03, 19:47
Location: UA
Contact:

Re: Preservation effort for current XUL Thunderbird extensions?

Unread post by JustOff » 2019-05-09, 16:53

Isengrim wrote:
2019-05-08, 21:29
New Tobin Paradigm wrote:
2019-05-08, 18:33
Port them to Interlink.
This is a long-term goal. Short term, I think it would be beneficial to archive as many as possible so that we can continue work on porting them or referencing them even if they are wiped from the TB add-ons site.
See Issue #58 (ca-archive).
Here are the add-ons I made in a spare time. That was fun!

Locked