Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Support and discussions for the x86/x64 Linux version of Pale Moon and specific Linux distribution questions related to the browser.

Moderator: trava90

Forum rules
If your question is about general use of the browser and not specific to Linux, then please use the General Support board.
User avatar
moonbat
Moon Magic practitioner
Moon Magic practitioner
Posts: 2287
Joined: 2015-12-09, 15:45

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by moonbat » 2020-05-08, 12:25

Pentium4User wrote:
2020-05-08, 09:45
These are often still used and can't be easily replaced due to missing money.
How expensive is a fifth hand 64bit computer these days? Even something a decade old is better than this antiquated early 2000s stuff.
"One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them and in the darkness BIND them."

Image
Linux Mint 20 Xfce x64 on HP i5-5200 laptop, 12 GB RAM.
Advanced URL Builder(fork)|PermissionsPlus|PMPlayer|Pure URL|RecordRewind|TextFX

User avatar
Moonchild
Pale Moon guru
Pale Moon guru
Posts: 28168
Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
Location: Tranås, SE
Contact:

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by Moonchild » 2020-05-08, 12:40

It really won't cost you more than $50 to get something usable, maybe even half-decent.
"There will be times when the position you advocate, no matter how well framed and supported, will not be accepted by the public simply because you are who you are." -- Merrill Rose
Image

User avatar
stevepusser
Project Contributor
Project Contributor
Posts: 677
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by stevepusser » 2020-05-08, 18:00

Working on 28.9.3 now. <crosses fingers>

32 bit also is relevant for current ARM builds, such as for the Pi, which I'm now doing in the repo, so it's not that simple. $50 is also quite a bit of cash in many poorer countries where many people may rely on older computers, so I try to provide 32-bit packages if it doesn't take heroic efforts to do so.

User avatar
New Tobin Paradigm
Knows the dark side
Knows the dark side
Posts: 8082
Joined: 2012-10-09, 19:37
Location: I'm.. over there.

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by New Tobin Paradigm » 2020-05-08, 18:06

Aren't all Pis 64bit now?
Your computer has too much computer in it and not enough typewriter.
Image

User avatar
stevepusser
Project Contributor
Project Contributor
Posts: 677
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by stevepusser » 2020-05-08, 18:29

Maybe the Pi 4...but Raspian is still 32-bit.

User avatar
Moonchild
Pale Moon guru
Pale Moon guru
Posts: 28168
Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
Location: Tranås, SE
Contact:

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by Moonchild » 2020-05-08, 20:45

Also keep in mind that our support for ARM-64 is worse than ARM-32 when it comes to JavaScript JITing. We have no IonMonkey support for ARM-64, for example.
"There will be times when the position you advocate, no matter how well framed and supported, will not be accepted by the public simply because you are who you are." -- Merrill Rose
Image

User avatar
stevepusser
Project Contributor
Project Contributor
Posts: 677
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by stevepusser » 2020-05-09, 03:43

With today's builds for MX Linux on my laptop, I was able to streamline the linker flags a little:

Code: Select all

ac_add_options --enable-optimize="-O2 -w -Wl,--no-keep-memory,--reduce-memory-overhead"
so I'll add those to the OBS builds with the next version

User avatar
New Tobin Paradigm
Knows the dark side
Knows the dark side
Posts: 8082
Joined: 2012-10-09, 19:37
Location: I'm.. over there.

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by New Tobin Paradigm » 2020-05-09, 06:10

I'll make a note about that in the linux build instructions on the developer site sooner or later.
Your computer has too much computer in it and not enough typewriter.
Image

User avatar
stevepusser
Project Contributor
Project Contributor
Posts: 677
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by stevepusser » 2020-06-07, 03:03

28.10.0 in now in the repo for 32 and 64-bit Intel/AMD and ARM64 architectures.

All 32-bit ARM (armhf) builds are now failing with this error, though:

Code: Select all

[10553s] In file included from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/platform/js/src/gc/StoreBuffer.h:17,
[10553s]                  from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/platform/js/src/gc/Barrier.h:13,
[10553s]                  from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/platform/js/src/jsatom.h:14,
[10553s]                  from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/platform/js/src/vm/Xdr.h:13,
[10553s]                  from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/platform/js/src/vm/Xdr.cpp:7,
[10553s]                  from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/obj-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/js/src/Unified_cpp_js_src36.cpp:2:
[10553s] /usr/src/packages/BUILD/platform/js/src/ds/LifoAlloc.h: In instantiation of 'T* js::LifoAllocPolicy<fb>::maybe_pod_calloc(size_t) [with T = js::detail::HashTableEntry<js::HashMapEntry<js::wasm::AstSig*, unsigned int> >; js::Fallibility fb = js::Fallible; size_t = unsigned int]':
[10553s] /usr/src/packages/BUILD/obj-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/dist/include/js/HashTable.h:1249:63:   required from 'static js::detail::HashTable<T, HashPolicy, AllocPolicy>::Entry* js::detail::HashTable<T, HashPolicy, AllocPolicy>::createTable(AllocPolicy&, uint32_t, js::detail::HashTable<T, HashPolicy, AllocPolicy>::FailureBehavior) [with T = js::HashMapEntry<js::wasm::AstSig*, unsigned int>; HashPolicy = js::HashMap<js::wasm::AstSig*, unsigned int, js::wasm::AstSig, js::LifoAllocPolicy<js::Fallible> >::MapHashPolicy; AllocPolicy = js::LifoAllocPolicy<js::Fallible>; js::detail::HashTable<T, HashPolicy, AllocPolicy>::Entry = js::detail::HashTableEntry<js::HashMapEntry<js::wasm::AstSig*, unsigned int> >; uint32_t = unsigned int]'
[10553s] /usr/src/packages/BUILD/obj-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/dist/include/js/HashTable.h:1317:28:   required from 'bool js::detail::HashTable<T, HashPolicy, AllocPolicy>::init(uint32_t) [with T = js::HashMapEntry<js::wasm::AstSig*, unsigned int>; HashPolicy = js::HashMap<js::wasm::AstSig*, unsigned int, js::wasm::AstSig, js::LifoAllocPolicy<js::Fallible> >::MapHashPolicy; AllocPolicy = js::LifoAllocPolicy<js::Fallible>; uint32_t = unsigned int]'
[10553s] /usr/src/packages/BUILD/obj-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/dist/include/js/HashTable.h:92:69:   required from 'bool js::HashMap<Key, Value, HashPolicy, AllocPolicy>::init(uint32_t) [with Key = js::wasm::AstSig*; Value = unsigned int; HashPolicy = js::wasm::AstSig; AllocPolicy = js::LifoAllocPolicy<js::Fallible>; uint32_t = unsigned int]'
[10553s] /usr/src/packages/BUILD/platform/js/src/wasm/WasmAST.h:802:29:   required from here
[10553s] /usr/src/packages/BUILD/platform/js/src/ds/LifoAlloc.h:616:15: warning: 'void* memset(void*, int, size_t)' clearing an object of type 'class js::detail::HashTableEntry<js::HashMapEntry<js::wasm::AstSig*, unsigned int> >' with no trivial copy-assignment [-Wclass-memaccess]
[10553s]   616 |         memset(p, 0, numElems * sizeof(T));
[10553s]       |         ~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[10553s] In file included from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/obj-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/dist/include/js/TracingAPI.h:12,
[10553s]                  from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/obj-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/dist/include/js/GCPolicyAPI.h:46,
[10553s]                  from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/obj-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/dist/include/js/RootingAPI.h:23,
[10553s]                  from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/obj-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/dist/include/js/CallArgs.h:73,
[10553s]                  from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/obj-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/dist/include/js/CallNonGenericMethod.h:12,
[10553s]                  from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/platform/js/src/NamespaceImports.h:15,
[10553s]                  from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/platform/js/src/gc/Barrier.h:10,
[10553s]                  from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/platform/js/src/jsatom.h:14,
[10553s]                  from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/platform/js/src/vm/Xdr.h:13,
[10553s]                  from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/platform/js/src/vm/Xdr.cpp:7,
[10553s]                  from /usr/src/packages/BUILD/obj-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/js/src/Unified_cpp_js_src36.cpp:2:
[10553s] /usr/src/packages/BUILD/obj-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/dist/include/js/HashTable.h:788:7: note: 'class js::detail::HashTableEntry<js::HashMapEntry<js::wasm::AstSig*, unsigned int> >' declared here
[10553s]   788 | class HashTableEntry
[10553s]       |       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[10555s] make[6]: *** [/usr/src/packages/BUILD/platform/config/rules.mk:886: Unified_cpp_js_src36.o] Error 1

User avatar
adesh
Board Warrior
Board Warrior
Posts: 1232
Joined: 2017-06-06, 07:38

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by adesh » 2020-06-07, 12:46

Off-topic:
You pasted good amount of log output but forgot to include the actual error message.

User avatar
stevepusser
Project Contributor
Project Contributor
Posts: 677
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by stevepusser » 2020-06-08, 03:44

Hmm--it's tough to pick out. Here's another of the failed arm builds, for Debian Buster: https://build.opensuse.org/public/build ... emoon/_log

Do you think it's this line, which appears several times in the parallel build?

Code: Select all

[13526s] /usr/src/packages/BUILD/platform/js/src/wasm/WasmBaselineCompile.cpp:3504:25: error: 'ins' was not declared in this scope

User avatar
adesh
Board Warrior
Board Warrior
Posts: 1232
Joined: 2017-06-06, 07:38

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by adesh » 2020-06-08, 09:55

Issue got introduced with MIPS support.

Error is due to a typo in this commit:
https://github.com/MoonchildProductions ... b9adeR3394

Replace `IsUnaligned(ins->access())` with `IsUnaligned(access)` in the affected file and retry the build. It has to be fixed in the code though.

EDIT:
I've corrected the typo in my branch here: https://github.com/adeshkp/UXP/tree/fix-arm-build
Can you try the ARM build on this branch? Let us know if it succeeds so it can be merged into platform.

User avatar
stevepusser
Project Contributor
Project Contributor
Posts: 677
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by stevepusser » 2020-06-09, 04:42

I'll make a patch to change the code and see what happens in the OBS.

User avatar
stevepusser
Project Contributor
Project Contributor
Posts: 677
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by stevepusser » 2020-06-10, 02:57

That fixed it, so go ahead and push the patch.

https://build.opensuse.org/package/show ... r/palemoon

User avatar
stevepusser
Project Contributor
Project Contributor
Posts: 677
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by stevepusser » 2020-07-18, 03:49

28.11.0 is now in the repo, even for Debian Sid, which needed a workaround. Sorry for the delay.

Also removed repos for Ubuntu 18.10 and 19.04, since they aren't LTS. I can restore them if anyone's still using those releases for some reason. I left 19.10 since it's not that old.

User avatar
Pentium4User
Lunatic
Lunatic
Posts: 465
Joined: 2019-04-24, 09:38

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by Pentium4User » 2020-07-18, 07:06

stevepusser wrote:
2020-07-18, 03:49
28.11.0 is now in the repo, even for Debian Sid, which needed a workaround. Sorry for the delay.

Also removed repos for Ubuntu 18.10 and 19.04, since they aren't LTS. I can restore them if anyone's still using those releases for some reason. I left 19.10 since it's not that old.
19.10 reached EOL yesterday, so you can remove that too.
Powerline adapters (dLAN) hardly interfere shortwave radio, so stop using them.

Yes, I still use a 64 bit capable Pentium 4 670 processor with Pale Moon.

User avatar
stevepusser
Project Contributor
Project Contributor
Posts: 677
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by stevepusser » 2020-07-18, 17:48

OK--if anyone is still using 19.10, hopefully this will encourage them to move on.

User avatar
stevepusser
Project Contributor
Project Contributor
Posts: 677
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by stevepusser » 2020-07-24, 03:46

Pushing a -2 update which hopefully will automatically detect a Sid build and only use one build thread there, with four otherwise. Added lsb-release to the build-depends for the detection in mozconfig:

Code: Select all

if test `lsb_release -sc` = "sid"; then
    mk_add_options MOZ_MAKE_FLAGS="-j1"
else
    mk_add_options MOZ_MAKE_FLAGS="-j4"
fi

User avatar
Tharthan
Off-Topic Sheriff
Off-Topic Sheriff
Posts: 1022
Joined: 2019-05-20, 20:07
Location: New England

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by Tharthan » 2020-07-24, 05:31

Pentium4User wrote:
2020-05-08, 09:45
can't be easily replaced due to missing money.
Insufficient funds? Or did the money that they were going to use get lost in the couch cushions? ;)
moonbat wrote:
2020-05-08, 12:25
How expensive is a fifth hand 64bit computer these days? Even something a decade old is better than this antiquated early 2000s stuff.
I'll have you know that, aside from my Internet browsing, all of my serious work is done on an Apple Lisa. Works just fine for me.
"This is a war against individuality and intelligence. Only thing we can do is stand strong."adesh, 9 January 2020

"I used to think I was a grumpy old man, but I don't hold a candle compared to Tharthan."Cassette, 9 September 2020

Image

User avatar
stevepusser
Project Contributor
Project Contributor
Posts: 677
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Post by stevepusser » 2020-08-06, 02:30

28.12.0 builds are finishing up in the repo for Debian 8 through testing, Raspian 9 and 10, and Ubuntu 16.04, 18.04, and 20.04.

After all the drama with Sid recently, now a new python2 version mismatch error is preventing the build from even starting--IDK if that's temporary, or due to a scheduled removal of python 2, which will make PM builds impossible for now anyway.

Post Reply