Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Support and discussions for the x86/x64 Linux version of Pale Moon.

Moderators: trava90, satrow

Giorgos67
Hobby Astronomer
Hobby Astronomer
Posts: 16
Joined: 2014-06-26, 07:33
Location: Greece

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by Giorgos67 » 2018-12-18, 16:09

Any news? :D

Is it possible, new OBS key to be added?
For the glorious men, every land is a grave.
Pericles' Funeral Oration. Thucydides.

User avatar
stevepusser
Lunatic
Lunatic
Posts: 498
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by stevepusser » 2018-12-18, 23:01

Giorgos67 wrote:Any news? :D

Is it possible, new OBS key to be added?
Just rerun the commands to download and install the key--that fixes it. The keys are updated in the repo, so you just have to get and install it.

Giorgos67
Hobby Astronomer
Hobby Astronomer
Posts: 16
Joined: 2014-06-26, 07:33
Location: Greece

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by Giorgos67 » 2018-12-19, 12:12

stevepusser wrote:
Giorgos67 wrote:Any news? :D

Is it possible, new OBS key to be added?
Just rerun the commands to download and install the key--that fixes it. The keys are updated in the repo, so you just have to get and install it.
THANKS!!! :thumbup:
Problem solved!

Just in case, one last question:
I have a similar problem with Veracrypt repository.

Code: Select all

#apt-key add - < Release.key
key 0FAD31CA8719FCE4:
1 signature not checked due to a missing key
OK
#
Veracrypt can't be installed.
For the glorious men, every land is a grave.
Pericles' Funeral Oration. Thucydides.

User avatar
stevepusser
Lunatic
Lunatic
Posts: 498
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by stevepusser » 2018-12-21, 01:33

Yeah...I don't have a clue what the OBS is doing with the keys. If deleting any previously downloaded Release.key files and then reinstalling Veracrypt's from that OBS repo doesn't fix it, it can be worked around by adding

Code: Select all

[trusted=yes] 
after the "deb" in the start of the source line in the file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d, if you trust me.
Last edited by stevepusser on 2018-12-21, 01:34, edited 2 times in total.

Giorgos67
Hobby Astronomer
Hobby Astronomer
Posts: 16
Joined: 2014-06-26, 07:33
Location: Greece

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by Giorgos67 » 2018-12-22, 11:58

Nope! It keeps failing.
This time it can't find veracrypt (although it finds debug package and arm arch related package).

I think for the time being 'll continue to use the official installer.

PS. I tested also the debian testing related repository and works flawlessly (on debian testing)! :thumbup:

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!!! :wave:
For the glorious men, every land is a grave.
Pericles' Funeral Oration. Thucydides.

User avatar
stevepusser
Lunatic
Lunatic
Posts: 498
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by stevepusser » 2018-12-22, 19:12

Which version of Veracrypt are you having problems with? Is it the Debian Stretch one?

Giorgos67
Hobby Astronomer
Hobby Astronomer
Posts: 16
Joined: 2014-06-26, 07:33
Location: Greece

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by Giorgos67 » 2018-12-23, 13:45

I'm on Devuan ASCII x64 KDE (based on Debian Stretch, both stable editions).

I have Veracrypt v.1.23 (latest stable) x64 with GUI), installed via the official installer.

Uninstalling it and downloading the DEB installer from your repository works fine! (so the binary is flawless). :thumbup:
It's just the repository who refuse to work here!
No hint, why this happens. :o
G.
For the glorious men, every land is a grave.
Pericles' Funeral Oration. Thucydides.

User avatar
stevepusser
Lunatic
Lunatic
Posts: 498
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by stevepusser » 2019-01-15, 22:15

Pale Moon is updated to 28.3.0 in the repo. The 32-bit versions are done, but the 64-bit are taking a bit longer to be visible as upgrades.

Also added an "Ubuntu_Next" repository, aka 19.04 at the moment.

Manually built Ubuntu Trusty packages have been uploaded to archive.org. They require gcc-5 for Trusty from the Ubuntu Toolchain PPA: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain ... buntu/test

Direct deb downloads for Trusty: 32-bit 64-bit

User avatar
stevepusser
Lunatic
Lunatic
Posts: 498
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by stevepusser » 2019-01-26, 01:16

28.3.1 packages are in the repo for Debian 8, 9, Testing, and Ubuntu 16.04, 18.04, 18.10, and Ubuntu "Next" (19.04)

Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty debs that need gcc-5 from this PPA: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain ... buntu/test can be downloaded from archive.org directly:

32-bit

64-bit

You can also download the torrent file for both debs here, and get them with a Bittorrent client.

Rollingthunder
Hobby Astronomer
Hobby Astronomer
Posts: 15
Joined: 2015-03-15, 00:29

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by Rollingthunder » 2019-02-11, 13:31

Hi Steve,

thanks for maintaining these repos.

Did you (recently) update the 28.3.1+repack-1 package without making it repack-2? Asking because the following felt a little strange:

Code: Select all

~ $ sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
  palemoon
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 41,5 MB of archives.
After this operation, 2.048 B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y
Get:1 http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/stevenpusser/xUbuntu_16.04  palemoon 28.3.1+repack-1 [41,5 MB]
Fetched 41,5 MB in 6s (6.037 kB/s)                                                                                              
(Reading database ... 248486 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../palemoon_28.3.1+repack-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking palemoon (28.3.1+repack-1) over (28.3.1+repack-1) ...
Processing triggers for gnome-menus (3.13.3-6ubuntu3.1) ...
Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils (0.22+linuxmint1) ...
Processing triggers for mime-support (3.59ubuntu1) ...
Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme (0.15-0ubuntu1.1) ...
Setting up palemoon (28.3.1+repack-1) ...

User avatar
stevepusser
Lunatic
Lunatic
Posts: 498
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by stevepusser » 2019-02-12, 19:34

Rollingthunder wrote:Hi Steve,

thanks for maintaining these repos.

Did you (recently) update the 28.3.1+repack-1 package without making it repack-2? Asking because the following felt a little strange:

Code: Select all

~ $ sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
  palemoon
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 41,5 MB of archives.
After this operation, 2.048 B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y
Get:1 http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/stevenpusser/xUbuntu_16.04  palemoon 28.3.1+repack-1 [41,5 MB]
Fetched 41,5 MB in 6s (6.037 kB/s)                                                                                              
(Reading database ... 248486 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../palemoon_28.3.1+repack-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking palemoon (28.3.1+repack-1) over (28.3.1+repack-1) ...
Processing triggers for gnome-menus (3.13.3-6ubuntu3.1) ...
Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils (0.22+linuxmint1) ...
Processing triggers for mime-support (3.59ubuntu1) ...
Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme (0.15-0ubuntu1.1) ...
Setting up palemoon (28.3.1+repack-1) ...
The OBS repo does automatically rebuild the packages from the same source if one or more of the build-dependencies is updated. Most of the other packages in the repo date back to the original upload, Jan. 25, but the 16.04 ones were rebuilt on Feb. 4 for one of those reasons. The Ubuntu updater seems to also look at the date of a package as well as a version. The Debian testing packages seem to get rebuilt every day at least.

You can click on a repo and then the details of a deb file to see when it was last rebuilt, such as on this page:

https://build.opensuse.org/package/bina ... untu_16.04

This is the first time I've seen that in 16.04; it's usually stable, unlike testing. I suppose you could lock the version until the next one comes out if you don't want to use the bandwidth.

Rollingthunder
Hobby Astronomer
Hobby Astronomer
Posts: 15
Joined: 2015-03-15, 00:29

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by Rollingthunder » 2019-02-12, 20:14

Thanks for the explanation, Steve. I wasn't concerned about the bandwidth but as this was unseen before behavior to me, I wanted to know why it happened. Granted due to the repo's key issues last year, it raised an eyebrow.

User avatar
stevepusser
Lunatic
Lunatic
Posts: 498
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by stevepusser » 2019-02-15, 21:06

Yes, it seems to be a "feature" of the OBS that I don't have any control over. Automatic rebuilds are pretty nice for some of my other more complex repos where a lot of packages depend on ffmpeg, though, so updating ffmpeg makes sure they all get rebuilt and work correctly.

User avatar
stevepusser
Lunatic
Lunatic
Posts: 498
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by stevepusser » 2019-02-19, 22:24

Updated to Pale Moon 28.4.0. The Ubuntu Next (19.04) i386 build machine machine died with a bunch of kernel oopsies, so I triggered a restart of the build to see if that fixed it. All the rest succeeded.

Edit: the rebuild succeeded.

Ubuntu Trusty 14.04 debs, which require gcc-5 from the toolchain PPA, are done now: (direct links) 32-bit 64-bit

User avatar
stevepusser
Lunatic
Lunatic
Posts: 498
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by stevepusser » 2019-03-01, 20:39

Updated Firejail, backports of which are provided as a convenience for users of the repo, to current 0.9.58.2 release. Firetools updated to 0.9.58.

User avatar
stevepusser
Lunatic
Lunatic
Posts: 498
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by stevepusser » 2019-03-09, 22:41

It looks like the repo keys were updated again March first, so if you get the message that the repository could not be authenticated, repeat the download and installation of the "Release.key" file in the instructions.

User avatar
stevepusser
Lunatic
Lunatic
Posts: 498
Joined: 2015-08-01, 18:33
Location: California

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by stevepusser » 2019-03-27, 19:55

Packages are done building for Debian 8, 9, and testing, and for Ubuntu 16.04, 18.04, 18.10, and 19.04 in the OBS repo. I have them also now providing the virtual gnome-www-browser and www-browser packages in case you have a desktop metapackage that insists on one of those.

Edit: Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty packages, requiring the gcc-5 runtime as usual from the Ubuntu toolchain PPA, are now available:

64-bit
32-bit
Torrent (gets both debs by default)

User avatar
martywd
Fanatic
Fanatic
Posts: 118
Joined: 2014-04-16, 14:36
Location: TX

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by martywd » 2019-03-28, 16:05

stevepusser wrote:Packages are done building for Debian 8, 9, and testing, and for Ubuntu 16.04, 18.04, 18.10, and 19.04 in the OBS repo. I have them also now providing the virtual gnome-www-browser and www-browser packages in case you have a desktop metapackage that insists on one of those.

...
@stevepusser

I see the new palemoon_28.4.1+repack(s) builds have been completed. But. At this moment, It seems the repositories are still only offering the palemoon_28.4.0+repack-1... ? Hmmmm?

For instance ==> http://download.opensuse.org/repositori ... ntu_18.04/

.

User avatar
Isengrim
Keeps coming back
Keeps coming back
Posts: 855
Joined: 2015-09-08, 22:54
Location: 127.0.0.1
Contact:

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by Isengrim » 2019-03-28, 22:59

I'm on 28.4.1 now. Thank you Steven! :thumbup:
Linux Mint 19.1 Cinnamon (64-bit), Windows 7 (64-bit), Windows 10 build 1803 (64-bit)
JavaScript is not Java
"As long as there is someone who will appreciate the work involved in the creation, the effort is time well spent." ~ Tetsuzou Kamadani, Cave Story

User avatar
martywd
Fanatic
Fanatic
Posts: 118
Joined: 2014-04-16, 14:36
Location: TX

Re: Ubuntu 16.04, 16.10, 17.04, 18.04 Debian 8, 9 Pale Moon repositories

Unread post by martywd » 2019-03-29, 00:21

Isengrim wrote:I'm on 28.4.1 now. Thank you Steven! :thumbup:
Ditto. After my previous post, a couple or three hours later, Linux Mint's Update Manager alerted me that the update was available.

This was just a bit weird. Last night, with the exception of xUbuntu_14.04, the status for all the 28.4.1 builds was 'succeeded', yet earlier today, still no availability of 28.4.1 packages to install. idk?

But all seems well now.
.

Post Reply