Alternatives to FossaMail

Development discussions for FossaMail

Moderators: satrow, Indalecio

User avatar
Aube Bleue
Hobby Astronomer
Hobby Astronomer
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 3:36 am
Location: Québec

Alternatives to FossaMail

Postby Aube Bleue » Tue Mar 14, 2017 8:04 pm

Moonchild, if FossaMail falls sadly into disuse, what client do you intend to use, personally? Would you go back to "building Thunderbird privately"? I'd like to know, if you don't mind me asking.
Linux 64-bit and 32-bit user.

User avatar
Moonchild
Pale Moon guru
Pale Moon guru
Posts: 18057
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 5:27 pm
Location: 58.5°N 15.5°E
Contact:

Re: New maintainer for FossaMail

Postby Moonchild » Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:03 pm

Aube Bleue wrote:Moonchild, if FossaMail falls sadly into disuse, what client do you intend to use, personally? Would you go back to "building Thunderbird privately"? I'd like to know, if you don't mind me asking.

I'd most likely make (very infrequent) builds of FossaMail for my own use, based on what is there now, with critical sec updates. The client works for my use, and isn't as exposed to sec issues as a browser would be (because no javascript).
Programmer - an organism that turns coffee into software.
Image

User avatar
half-moon
Astronaut
Astronaut
Posts: 863
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 12:30 pm
Location: USA

Re: New maintainer for FossaMail

Postby half-moon » Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:59 pm

Moonchild wrote:
Aube Bleue wrote:Moonchild, if FossaMail falls sadly into disuse, what client do you intend to use, personally? Would you go back to "building Thunderbird privately"? I'd like to know, if you don't mind me asking.

I'd most likely make (very infrequent) builds of FossaMail for my own use, based on what is there now, with critical sec updates. The client works for my use, and isn't as exposed to sec issues as a browser would be (because no javascript).


since I'm a bit paranoid, is it possible to configure thunderbird to be as secure as fossamail?

User avatar
Matt A Tobin
Knows the dark side
Knows the dark side
Posts: 3635
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:37 pm

Re: New maintainer for FossaMail

Postby Matt A Tobin » Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:54 pm

That depends on your definition of security. Not having JS Enabled for message content already makes it more "secure" but if you are thinking about anything that might come from the overall platform code? Then maybe not. But again, it depends on your definition.
Image

GreenGeek
Fanatic
Fanatic
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 4:36 pm

Re: New maintainer for FossaMail

Postby GreenGeek » Wed Mar 15, 2017 9:20 pm

I've been evaluating email alternatives all day. TB uses just over half the RAM that FM does (90 vs 160 MB), so FM is out of favor for me unless it has a new development that causes me to reconsider (but I'll keep it to see what happens). But I never really liked the TB platform anyway - it was always too much of a memory hog for my use, and I don't like pages opening in a built-in browser. I like Sylpheed best as a lightweight email client (~6MB) (closest to what I used for a decade and a half). The only bad point was no spell checking, and my typing on laptop with bad keys is a problem. So, I reinstalled Pegasus to try it again. I got it working; it uses ~30MB. It's about the only old legendary email app still in development. I may stick with it as primary and TB and Sylpheed as heavy and light backup choices. If you use another email program and just miss the Lightning calendar then using Sunbird is an option (~30MB).

User avatar
Matt A Tobin
Knows the dark side
Knows the dark side
Posts: 3635
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:37 pm

Re: New maintainer for FossaMail

Postby Matt A Tobin » Wed Mar 15, 2017 9:31 pm

GreenGeek wrote:I've been evaluating email alternatives all day. TB uses just over half the RAM that FM does (90 vs 160 MB), so FM is out of favor for me unless it has a new development that causes me to reconsider (but I'll keep it to see what happens). But I never really liked the TB platform anyway - it was always too much of a memory hog for my use, and I don't like pages opening in a built-in browser. I like Sylpheed best as a lightweight email client (~6MB) (closest to what I used for a decade and a half). The only bad point was no spell checking, and my typing on laptop with bad keys is a problem. So, I reinstalled Pegasus to try it again. I got it working; it uses ~30MB. It's about the only old legendary email app still in development. I may stick with it as primary and TB and Sylpheed as heavy and light backup choices. If you use another email program and just miss the Lightning calendar then using Sunbird is an option (~30MB).


Do I just attract off topic and misinformed people?

Sunbird has been dead since 2010.. The standalone code doesn't even exist anymore.. As for your other musings.. What does that have to do with the price of eggs at the corner store during winter in England?
Image

GreenGeek
Fanatic
Fanatic
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 4:36 pm

Re: New maintainer for FossaMail

Postby GreenGeek » Wed Mar 15, 2017 10:40 pm

Not replying to you, bulldog - just commenting on FM status and alternatives. I don't give a crap what you think, or anybody else for that matter.

BlueSnow
Moongazer
Moongazer
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 5:40 am

Re: New maintainer for FossaMail

Postby BlueSnow » Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:02 am

GreenGeek wrote:I've been evaluating email alternatives all day. TB uses just over half the RAM that FM does (90 vs 160 MB), so FM is out of favor for me unless it has a new development that causes me to reconsider (but I'll keep it to see what happens). But I never really liked the TB platform anyway - it was always too much of a memory hog for my use, and I don't like pages opening in a built-in browser. I like Sylpheed best as a lightweight email client (~6MB) (closest to what I used for a decade and a half). The only bad point was no spell checking, and my typing on laptop with bad keys is a problem. So, I reinstalled Pegasus to try it again. I got it working; it uses ~30MB. It's about the only old legendary email app still in development. I may stick with it as primary and TB and Sylpheed as heavy and light backup choices. If you use another email program and just miss the Lightning calendar then using Sunbird is an option (~30MB).
I think Claws Mail is related to, or at least similar to, Sylpheed; but has spell checking.

hackerman1
Lunatic
Lunatic
Posts: 326
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 3:12 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: New maintainer for FossaMail

Postby hackerman1 » Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:20 am

GreenGeek wrote:...I don't give a crap what you think, or anybody else for that matter.


That´s obvious, since the topic for this thread is New maintainer for FossaMail, not alternatives to FossaMail... ;) :)
Administrator on Windows Server to Workstation
Moderator (and "undercover" Admin) on The Windows Club Forum

Security: EAM, Comodo Firewall and HIPS, WinPatrol+, HOSTS-file, UAC (max), Sandboxie, NoScript and ADBlock.

GreenGeek
Fanatic
Fanatic
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 4:36 pm

Re: Alternatives to FossaMail

Postby GreenGeek » Thu Mar 16, 2017 4:06 pm

BlueSnow wrote:I think Claws Mail is related to, or at least similar to, Sylpheed; but has spell checking.


Thanks for reminding me - I had tried it quite some time ago but forgot. Seems like a good fit.
Last edited by GreenGeek on Thu Mar 16, 2017 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

MGA74
Moonbather
Moonbather
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 2:19 pm
Location: UK

Re: Alternatives to FossaMail

Postby MGA74 » Thu Mar 16, 2017 4:39 pm

hackerman1

When I scroll up to read the very first post on this thread it is entitled 'Alternatives to FossaMail'.

User avatar
DutchPete
Moonbather
Moonbather
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat May 24, 2014 11:45 am
Location: Somewhere

Re: Alternatives to FossaMail

Postby DutchPete » Thu Mar 16, 2017 5:40 pm

MGA74 wrote:hackerman1

When I scroll up to read the very first post on this thread it is entitled 'Alternatives to FossaMail'.

The original thread was about New Maintainer for FossaMail, but when people started to ask about alternatives a moderator must have transferred those post to this new thread. But some people on this new thread are still talking about Fossamail, hence the confusion.

hackerman1
Lunatic
Lunatic
Posts: 326
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 3:12 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Alternatives to FossaMail

Postby hackerman1 » Thu Mar 16, 2017 6:47 pm

MGA74 wrote:hackerman1

When I scroll up to read the very first post on this thread it is entitled 'Alternatives to FossaMail'.


Yes it is, now... ;)
This thread is a split-off from another thread: New Maintainer for FossaMail.
Since that thread was going off-topic, i pointed out what the topic was.
And reported it, suggesting a split-off...
Administrator on Windows Server to Workstation
Moderator (and "undercover" Admin) on The Windows Club Forum

Security: EAM, Comodo Firewall and HIPS, WinPatrol+, HOSTS-file, UAC (max), Sandboxie, NoScript and ADBlock.


Return to “FossaMail Development”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest