Dumbing down. The race to the bottom.badnick wrote:These things are understood by everyone.And I think in this way you will attract more people to use or try PM.
Not sure that's working out too well for Firefox atm.
Moderator: trava90
Dumbing down. The race to the bottom.badnick wrote:These things are understood by everyone.And I think in this way you will attract more people to use or try PM.
I'd say that is a very fair critique.I think at least 90 % from users of any browser don't understand this kind of technical explanation ... Maybe after each technical explanation you should write which from the following features improves : browser speed/videos playing/sites compatibility/security/CPu load/RAM consumption/ Interface features..etc. These things are understood by everyone.
Agreed, basically.Nobody wasting time to search on internet what means XUL, NSS ,TLs, etc, etc etc It's like when you go to doctor for dick pain and the doctor tells you have "Treponema pallidum " instead of syphilis.
Your questions are valid but your response leaves it hard to explain. In essence it's like having a truck that isprosecco wrote:Thanks, but when I look at all the info provided there, it shows a lot of technical details which don't mean really that much to me (although I do have an idea what it is about of course, I am not illiterate). I am just a Pale Moon user, and I don't really care whether my browser is based on this or that or something other like XUL or UXP or whatever else may come along.
I understand that it does not seem worth your time to dig into the technical descriptions of what makes theYou see what I mean? Those release pages were written for technically minded people, who are coders, maintainers, programmers, what have you.
Besides, my question was not pertaining specifically to 28. It was about the basic principle.
This is where your logic is flawed, you assume that in 27 everything was working.I mean, once you have something that works, why replace it with something else? Granted you need to make sure glitches, flaws, holes and whatnot are fixed. OK, the upgrade to 28 is something else as there is the UXP
migration thing but this is a special case.
And that is the crux of the situation in a nut shell. The issue with the OP is thattherube wrote: And so long as I aware of such potentialities I don't have to understand the actual underpinnings of those techy words (that are escaping me, presently). Unified, that's it, UXP.
Calm down and take a pill. I was deliberately vague for a reason.New Tobin Paradigm wrote:YOU Don't even know what you are talking about.. XUL has nothing to do with the specific WEB features mainly javascript for why doing UXP was desirable..
Does no one listen to me or read what I post? What Moonchild posts? What anyone posts dozens to hundreds of times in the past four years?
If this shit keeps up I am gonna have my self banned again.
Well stop it. You are chatting nonsense. Additionally, it is PISSING ME OFF!Thehandyman1957 wrote:Calm down and take a pill. I was deliberately vague for a reason.
Still pissing me off. Please, stop.Thehandyman1957 wrote:Also, if you had taken the time to look, you would have seen that I edited the post to include UXP.
Your anger is your own issue. Deal with it.New Tobin Paradigm wrote:Well stop it. You are chatting nonsense. Additionally, it is PISSING ME OFF!Thehandyman1957 wrote:Calm down and take a pill. I was deliberately vague for a reason.
Nurse - Tobin's having another one of his turns...New Tobin Paradigm wrote:If this shit keeps up I am gonna have my self banned again.
He absolutely did not.The issue with the OP is that he clearly states that he does not have even the basic understanding of the terms
Now that is an entirely different matter, & this thread should be locked on that alone.and that he neither wants to understand them nor cares what they mean.
How are we supposed to explain anything with that type of response?
therube wrote:He absolutely did not.
Yes, he did. And my point was valid.I am just a Pale Moon user, and I don't really care whether my browser is based on this or that or something other like XUL or UXP or whatever else may come along.
You see what I mean? Those release pages were written for technically minded people, who are coders, maintainers, programmers, what have you.
so i decided to look at Chrome's release notes.. the official site shows only commit logs that i could find.. e.g. https://chromium.googlesource.com/chrom ... er&n=10000.badnick wrote:I agree somehow with @prosecco .The explanations from each release are too technical. I think at least 90 % from users of any browser don't understand this kind of techinacal explanation because they work in other branches and have no skills in this domain. Maybe after each technical explanation you should write wich from the following features improves : browser speed/videos playing/sites compatibility/security/CPu load/RAM consumption/ Interface features..etc. These things are understood by everyone.And I think in this way you will attract more people to use or try PM.
the generic line at the start aside, it is written in a slightly more simple (less technical) yet corporate style. i don't think it is drastically more simple that people who don't understand PM release notes will be able to understand this. we also already explicitly highlight the benefits of each change in the release notes, so if users still find it overly complicated, that's on them."A number of fixes and improvements."
HTTP sites marked as "not secure".[r 161]
The Page Lifecycle API tells you when your tab has been suspended or restored.
The Payment Handler API makes it possible for web-based payment apps to support the Payment Request experience.
Content embedded in an iframe requires a user gesture to navigate the top-level browsing context to a different origin.
Since Chrome 1, the CSS cursor values for grab and grabbing have been prefixed; standard, un-prefixed values now supported