does Pale Moon have Bug 988266 (ABP style-set memory) ported?

General discussion and chat (archived)
RexyDallas

does Pale Moon have Bug 988266 (ABP style-set memory) ported?

Unread post by RexyDallas » 2017-10-04, 22:14

Does Pale Moon have Bug 988266 ported? I've tested it, and it appears the style-set memory usage is similar to that reported by the bug.


An unaltered version of the page mentioned (an edge-case) can be found at:
http://web.archive.org/web/201202200525 ... dex-c.html
(This page is very memory intensive with adblock enabled)

This bug is that, prior to this fix, the global style from ABP would be internally copied to every page, instead of being shared. I'd like to note that, in Firefox 55, this page still uses crazy amounts of memory with ABP enabled.

adisib
Lunatic
Lunatic
Posts: 380
Joined: 2015-06-13, 03:34
Location: KY

Re: does Pale Moon have Bug 988266 (ABP style-set memory) ported?

Unread post by adisib » 2017-10-04, 23:08

Pale Moon is still affected by that issue. You can track it here:
https://github.com/MoonchildProductions ... issues/117

dark_moon

Re: does Pale Moon have Bug 988266 (ABP style-set memory) ported?

Unread post by dark_moon » 2017-10-05, 19:52

Just use uBlock Origin and you get a fast adblocker without such problems

Locked