Web installer: features to implement?
-
Moonchild
- Project founder
- Posts: 38968
- Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
- Location: Sweden
Web installer: features to implement?
I'm wondering which of these features would be best to implement in the web installer. One gives more control, the other more automation (but also a bit more network traffic to test speeds) - always a difficult trade-off...
"There is no point in arguing with an idiot, because then you're both idiots." - Anonymous
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
-
megaman
Re: Web installer: features to implement?
The only thing they need to do is to find out which one is the better location, if manual is an option that becomes implemented.
-
Moonchild
- Project founder
- Posts: 38968
- Joined: 2011-08-28, 17:27
- Location: Sweden
Re: Web installer: features to implement?
For manual I can always extract the main domain and present that as a choice. That should give users a hint as to what is what.
"There is no point in arguing with an idiot, because then you're both idiots." - Anonymous
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past; wisdom is of the future." -- Native American proverb
"Linux makes everything difficult." -- Lyceus Anubite
-
Greenboyb1
Re: Web installer: features to implement?
I think that the automatic is better because it speeds up the load time.