Regarding the usage survey (Feb 2017)
Moderators: FranklinDM, Lootyhoof
-
- Keeps coming back
- Posts: 891
- Joined: 2016-05-15, 05:00
- Location: humid upstate NY
Regarding the usage survey (Feb 2017)
Regarding the current usage survey, I understand why you require respondents to include a valid email address—to prevent spamming, stuffing the ballot box, etc. I trust, however, that you separate the answers of the survey and the respondent's contact info, so that the survey is effectively anonymous?
20 July 1969 🌗 Apollo 11 🌓 "One small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind." 🚀
Re: Regarding the usage survey (Feb 2017)
The idea, as I understand it, is to only accept valid user's input not bogus results from bots or people out to skew the results. For instance, results from palemoonsucks@mozillafanboy.com or chomeis@thefuture.com would be discarded, is my guess.
Again, as I understand it and how it has always worked is, once the survey ends the data is tabulated and the emails are destroyed.
Again, as I understand it and how it has always worked is, once the survey ends the data is tabulated and the emails are destroyed.
-
- Moonbather
- Posts: 54
- Joined: 2015-01-04, 08:21
- Location: Beijing
Re: Regarding the usage survey (Feb 2017)
Is there a way to answer to the survey in an alternative way, I mean without accessing google servers?
My location tells you why...
My location tells you why...
Re: Regarding the usage survey (Feb 2017)
That was my worry also, though I don't live in China, we are not exactly living in the land of the free anymore and Iandy80 wrote:Is there a way to answer to the survey in an alternative way, I mean without accessing google servers?
My location tells you why...
simply don't trust Google. Not even with my email address.