Raymond Hill (uBO author) recommends some changes to Pale Moon's framework, to prevent false positives in relation to filtering.
Don't know if such changes are reasonable, or even possible.. but you can find more info on the subject here:
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues/3693/
Framework changes? Topic is solved
Forum rules
Please keep everything here strictly on-topic.
This board is meant for Pale Moon source code development related subjects only like code snippets, patches, specific bugs, git, the repositories, etc.
This is not for tech support! Please do not post tech support questions in the "Development" board!
Please make sure not to use this board for support questions. Please post issues with specific websites, extensions, etc. in the relevant boards for those topics.
Please keep things on-topic as this forum will be used for reference for Pale Moon development. Expect topics that aren't relevant as such to be moved or deleted.
Please keep everything here strictly on-topic.
This board is meant for Pale Moon source code development related subjects only like code snippets, patches, specific bugs, git, the repositories, etc.
This is not for tech support! Please do not post tech support questions in the "Development" board!
Please make sure not to use this board for support questions. Please post issues with specific websites, extensions, etc. in the relevant boards for those topics.
Please keep things on-topic as this forum will be used for reference for Pale Moon development. Expect topics that aren't relevant as such to be moved or deleted.
Re: Framework changes?
You understood him completely wrong. You just have to add behind-the-scene to the whitelist until someone smart enough updates uBlock legacy (or its fork) so that it can filter behind-the-scene requests as accurately as uBlock WebExtension 1.15.20+.Tomaso wrote:Raymond Hill (uBO author) recommends some changes to Pale Moon's framework