Framework changes? Topic is solved

Talk about code development, features, specific bugs, enhancements, patches, and similar things.
Forum rules
Please keep everything here strictly on-topic.
This board is meant for Pale Moon source code development related subjects only like code snippets, patches, specific bugs, git, the repositories, etc.

This is not for tech support! Please do not post tech support questions in the "Development" board!
Please make sure not to use this board for support questions. Please post issues with specific websites, extensions, etc. in the relevant boards for those topics.

Please keep things on-topic as this forum will be used for reference for Pale Moon development. Expect topics that aren't relevant as such to be moved or deleted.
User avatar
Tomaso
Board Warrior
Board Warrior
Posts: 1622
Joined: 2015-07-23, 16:09
Location: Norway

Framework changes?

Unread post by Tomaso » 2018-04-09, 14:21

Raymond Hill (uBO author) recommends some changes to Pale Moon's framework, to prevent false positives in relation to filtering.
Don't know if such changes are reasonable, or even possible.. but you can find more info on the subject here:
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/issues/3693/

JustOff

Re: Framework changes?

Unread post by JustOff » 2018-04-09, 15:31

Tomaso wrote:Raymond Hill (uBO author) recommends some changes to Pale Moon's framework
You understood him completely wrong. You just have to add behind-the-scene to the whitelist until someone smart enough updates uBlock legacy (or its fork) so that it can filter behind-the-scene requests as accurately as uBlock WebExtension 1.15.20+.

Locked