Moonchild wrote:hope the work on Pale moon 7.0 will be a little bit faster than usual, considering that Pale moon 6.x.exe is detected as "Highly Critical" by Secunia PSI -Secure Browsing page.
I'm sorry, but what bearing does an obviously flawed "secure browsing" tool have on the speed with which I release the browser?
"Cybercriminals are increasingly targeting private PCs (endpoints). Their entry points are vulnerabilities (certain code errors or bugs) in popular third party (non-Microsoft) programs, which are exploited and used as a gateway to compromise PCs and access confidential data such as passwords, online profiles, and bank details. Attacks exploiting vulnerable programs and plug-ins are rarely blocked by traditional anti-virus."
Do I smell a Microsoft bias there?

MSIE is much worse as far as exploits go.
Also: if Firefox 6 and ilk were so critically flawed, do you really think that the community as a whole wouldn't be on Mozilla's case about it?
Well, it's really hard to say Secunia PSI is a "flawed" tool. There is no perfect software of course, but Secunia is not an antivirus, and it doesn't detect "False positive". The highly critical vulnerability in Pale Moon and in Firefox 6.x are accurately described - if you like I can post a link to the related Secunia Advisory.
About FF 6.x some people already switched to FF7; besides, not everyone use Secunia, or knows what it is.
I wrote that I hope in a faster work on Pale Moon 7 because Pale Moon6.x is not safe for browsing at the moment, so I hope Pale Moon 7 will be ready as soon as possible.
Hope everything is clear now.
Regards