Search found 2529 matches
- 2017-01-18, 16:13
- Forum: General support
- Topic: Font problems on various sites
- Replies: 15
- Views: 1277
Re: Font problems on various sites
In my case, disabling "Allow pages to choose their own fonts..." fixed the problem for me as well and it didn't come back after a browser restart. For testing, I didn't disable "Allow pages to choose their own fonts..." The test profile was pristine 'vanilla out-of-the-box' for comparison's sake, t...
- 2017-01-18, 13:32
- Forum: General support
- Topic: Other broken addons...
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2176
Re: Other broken addons...
[*]adblock latitude (blue dot indicating PM support no longer shows options anywhere). Seems to have lost settings.... . . . . . . [*]Download bar has gone awol.... . . . . . . tree-style tab no longer working and tabs are screwed up.... About Adblock Latitude . ABL 3.0.3.1 (if that's the version t...
- 2017-01-18, 03:20
- Forum: General support
- Topic: Font problems on various sites
- Replies: 15
- Views: 1277
Re: Font problems on various sites
Tried OP's site with new, fresh profile, using Portable PM 27.03 on Win 7 x86:
The first (and only the first) time the browser ran with this new profile, the custom fonts rendered properly.
But after a single exit and restart the problem returned, fonts were cropped as shown in OP's screenshot.
The first (and only the first) time the browser ran with this new profile, the custom fonts rendered properly.
But after a single exit and restart the problem returned, fonts were cropped as shown in OP's screenshot.
- 2017-01-17, 09:48
- Forum: General support
- Topic: Font problems on various sites
- Replies: 15
- Views: 1277
Re: Font problems on various sites
I see this too, not only with current PM -- same problem exists when using PM 26.5 and Firefox and SeaMonkey as well. When the preference to "Allow pages to choose their own fonts" is de-selected, the page renders legibly. Same result with each of these browsers.
- 2017-01-09, 18:51
- Forum: Browser extensions
- Topic: ScreenGrab appears to fail in v27
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1798
Re: ScreenGrab appears to fail in v27
I confirmed. But... See 766661 . I haven't a better idea... . . . . An example: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766661#c0 There has always (so far as I know) been a length limit for these screenshots: 32,700 pixels. The example page given in that bug comment , ( http://planet.mozilla.o...
- 2017-01-09, 18:05
- Forum: Browser extensions
- Topic: ScreenGrab appears to fail in v27
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1798
Re: ScreenGrab appears to fail in v27
Do you include a file path? I'm using commands like 'using "screenshot c:\images\web\page --fullpage" No file path. Just took a screenshot of your Amazon page using this: screenshot amazonTestScreenshot --fullpage There seems to be a problem attaching this particular screenshot, but you can see it ...
- 2017-01-08, 21:24
- Forum: Browser extensions
- Topic: ScreenGrab appears to fail in v27
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1798
Re: ScreenGrab appears to fail in v27
It might have a built-in page length limit (in pixels). can someone suggest a way to capture the current page when it's larger than the visible screen? I take full page screenshots natively using the Developer Toolbar from PM's dev tools; it captures up to a page length of 32,700 pixels: Access via ...
- 2017-01-07, 22:44
- Forum: General support
- Topic: Address Bar/Navigation Garbled Weird Display
- Replies: 7
- Views: 629
- 2017-01-07, 20:50
- Forum: General support
- Topic: Change URL window clicking action?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1307
Re: Change URL window clicking action?
Brian wrote:is there a way I can change that action to put the cursor wherever in the URL I click, instead of selecting the URL?
In about:config, try changing: browser.urlbar.clickSelectsAll to false.
Worked just now for me.
- 2017-01-07, 17:33
- Forum: Browser extensions
- Topic: A new tracking blocker alternative?
- Replies: 31
- Views: 5044
Re: A new tracking blocker alternative?
For those who want to use Ghostery, Privacy Badger etc. with PM in future, looks like this will be possible (as of PM 27.1?)
Please read this thread, in particular this post: https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=14157&start=60#p102938
Please read this thread, in particular this post: https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=14157&start=60#p102938
- 2017-01-04, 20:29
- Forum: Pale Moon for Mac OS X
- Topic: Photobucket Images Dont Work
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1451
Re: Photobucket Images Dont Work
tunescool wrote:is there a way to make an exception for photobucket
Click on ABL toolbar button -> Select from dropdown menu: Disable on photobucket.com
- 2016-12-29, 10:53
- Forum: General support
- Topic: Count the number of bookmarks
- Replies: 2
- Views: 263
Re: Count the number of bookmarks
spiralofhope wrote:Open the bookmarks sidebar
Need to do this with the library rather than sidebar:
Open it via Ctrl+Shift+B
or Bookmarks -> Organize Bookmarks
Also, I don't believe safe mode is required. It just now worked for me without that.
- 2016-12-29, 00:47
- Forum: Pale Moon for Linux
- Topic: Pale Moon slow performance
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1640
Re: Pale Moon slow performance
mozart78 wrote:If I install Adblock Latitude, the loading slows even more...
Which version of Adblock Latitude? v3.5 or v4.0 ?
- 2016-12-27, 10:48
- Forum: Browser extensions
- Topic: [OLD Official Thread] Adblock Latitude
- Replies: 558
- Views: 90757
Re: [Official Thread] Adblock Latitude
EHH has stopped working properly. When I select an element to hide, the preview works, but the rules are no longer being added. Seems to be triggered by something that changed in EasyList, since on or around Dec 04. (See posts here , here and here .) For me this problem has not been specific to ABL...
- 2016-12-25, 23:51
- Forum: The Pale Moon add-ons website
- Topic: Compatibility Reports for Post-v25 Pale Moon
- Replies: 92
- Views: 54398
Re: Compatibility Reports for Post-v25 Pale Moon
See the image. These are the files/folders that I highlighted before sending them to the compressed folder. Is this correct? Your image looks correct (to me), apparently that's not why you're getting the error message. And just to verify, the file that needs editing is \chrome\content\ SIOverlay.js...
- 2016-12-25, 08:25
- Forum: General support
- Topic: Facebook picture problem
- Replies: 2
- Views: 292
- 2016-12-25, 02:59
- Forum: The Pale Moon add-ons website
- Topic: Compatibility Reports for Post-v25 Pale Moon
- Replies: 92
- Views: 54398
Re: Compatibility Reports for Post-v25 Pale Moon
HOWEVER, when I make the changes in the posting just above these I get a message that says, "This addon cannot be installed because it appears to be corrupt." Sounds like you may not have kept the original folder structure. If after making your edits, you closed the containing folder and R-clicked ...
- 2016-12-24, 23:35
- Forum: The Pale Moon add-ons website
- Topic: Compatibility Reports for Post-v25 Pale Moon
- Replies: 92
- Views: 54398
Re: Compatibility Reports for Post-v25 Pale Moon
Ok, you're gonna have to explain that in a way that a computer hardware repair tech, who sucks at coding and logic, can understand what you typed. I take it you're telling me that there is something that can be edited, somewhere, but I haven't a clue where to go to do that. . . . . . . . Can you gi...
- 2016-12-24, 11:55
- Forum: General support
- Topic: best pdf reader plugin for palemoon
- Replies: 3
- Views: 829
Re: best pdf reader plugin for palemoon
i don't have adobe acrobat on my windowsXP anymore... You didn't mention if you use x86 or x64, but be aware that the official Sumatra plugin is x86 and was last included in v2.5.2 (Sumatra's github wiki: Browser plugin ). To use it you can install v2.5.2 from their archive , then upgrade if you li...
- 2016-12-22, 22:10
- Forum: Pale Moon for Linux
- Topic: Pale Moon 27.0.3 - no Ignore Word option in spellcheck?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 785
Re: Pale Moon 27.0.3 - no Ignore Word option in spellcheck?
Off-topic:
Flavour is correct for anyone who uses British English (like OP) :)
half-moon wrote:...but I know you are spelling flavor wrong.
Flavour is correct for anyone who uses British English (like OP) :)