Pale Moon 15.3 beta 3 (public beta)

[Moonchild]

Thanks for pointing that out, but considering transitions are still a working draft, the -moz prefix for it (still being considered an experimental technology) is not something pressing right now.
See also: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/CSS/transition

I will consider reviewing the CSS spec for it, but considering the gecko version used by documentation standards uses the -moz prefix, and application/engine version may (and regularly is) be checked by websites as a determining factor, removing the prefix would potentially break those sites (finding a 15.* browser, subsequently serving a dynamic page with -moz prefix, and transitions as a result not working).

Depending on release plans and what code base is going to be used for the next major version of Pale Moon, I may possibly add support for both syntaxes, but will not remove the -moz syntax support in 15.* because of the above.

But it works, even without the moz prefix, so this isn't a big problem

No, actually, it doesn't

[Tallgeese]

Ah, thank you for the thoughtful response.

I am sorry if I seemed oddly insistent, I was half-asleep at the time. The reason I pointed it out is because FF 16 lets you use transitions without the -moz prefix, and I wasn't quite sure if you wanted to keep Pale Moon's CSS3 implementation in line with Mozilla's.